The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Rafael Nadal - Novak Djokovic 0: 3 (Act 1) - Walla! sport

2020-10-11T13:39:45.615Z


Roland Garros final: Two of the greatest tennis players of all time meet in a battle for the title in the Paris clay tournament, with the battle for the top spot in the Grand Slam table. Nadal is looking for a 13th degree in France, Djokovic hopes to continue a rare year


  • sport

  • tennis

Roland Garros 2020

Rafael Nadal - Novak Djokovic 0: 3 (Act 1)

Roland Garros final: Two of the greatest tennis players of all time meet in a battle for the title in the Paris clay tournament, with the battle for the top spot in the Grand Slam table.

Nadal is looking for a 13th degree in France, Djokovic hopes to continue a rare year

Tags

  • Raphael Nadal

  • Novak Djokovic

Walla!

sport

Sunday, 11 October 2020, 16:33

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on WhatsApp

  • Share on general

  • Share on general

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Email

0 comments

Can win Roland Garros for the 13th time.

Nadal (Photo: Reuters)

The Clasico of the Tennis World: The Roland Garros Final brings together at this time Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal.

Two of the best tennis players of all time meet in a giant duel, which may contribute to the question of the greatest tennis player in history: Although Roger Federer is still at the top of the all-time Grand Slam winning table with 20, but if Nadal (19) wins he will equal him, while Dj And Kovic, the youngest in the bunch (who stands at 17 titles), will stick with and stabilize at 18 Grand Slams.



Nadal, the king of clay, has won the title in Paris 12 times in the past, and has yet to drop a battle in the current tournament.

He looked a bit vulnerable this year, after losing to Diego Schwartzman on clay in the Roma tournament, but defeating the Argentine in the semi-finals and recording a 99 victory over Roland Garros, just to illustrate his control of the Grand Slam tournament in France.

His unusual balance on clay in Paris stands at 2:99.

Good to know (promoted)

Time for self-indulgence: What can we buy ourselves for the holidays this year?

In collaboration with Shomrat Hazorea

To the full article

Amazing season.

Djokovic Vandal (Photo: Reuters)

On the other hand, many claim that he still comes as an underdog against Djokovic, who is in the middle of an almost perfect year, with a balance of 1:37 in 2020 (and as you know, the only loss in it was when he was disqualified in the US Championship). Djokovic will hope Take advantage of the fact that this year the conditions at Roland Garros are slightly different, given the fact that the tournament takes place in winter, without crowds, and the clay condition is slightly different.Nadal has



won six of their seven games at Roland Garros, including the two finals in 2012 and 2014. However, Djokovic Defeated Nadal in the last meeting between them at Roland Garros, in the quarterfinals of 2015, and he leads Nadal 26:29 in a balance between them head to head.If Djokovic wins, he will become the first in history to win at least twice in each of the four Grand Slams.

The two warriors enter the arena.

Djokovic Vandal (Photo: Reuters)

* 1: 0

- Nadal managed to come back from Djokovic's 15:40 and achieved the first break of the game already in the first game.

Even in the semifinals Nadal achieved a break already in the first game.



2: 0 - Djokovic with not a bad game at all, but despite this Nadal managed to keep his submissions.



* 3: 0

- Another break for Nadal after Djokovic sent a diagonal hand straight to the net.

The Serb is unable to find solutions.

Already broken in the first game.

Djokovic (Photo: Reuters)

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on WhatsApp

  • Share on general

  • Share on general

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Email

0 comments

Source: walla

All sports articles on 2020-10-11

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.