The owners of Hapoel B'Shlosha against the plea bargains of Maccabi and Hapoel Haifa: "Unity.
Joshua was sent off for 4 games that must be aggravated during the Corona period.
So a brawl and a crowd of dozens of people allows for a plea deal? "
Alona Barkat
Photo:
Alan Shiver
The owner of Hapoel B'Shlosha,
Alona Barkat, this
evening (Wednesday) attacked the decision of the Football Association's tribunal, claiming a lack of uniformity on the part of the court and prosecutor Nir Reshef, in light of the plea agreements reached with Maccabi and Hapoel Haifa following the derby events.
As you may recall, a player from Hapoel BS Joshua was sent off for 4 games following a spitting move towards Avi Rikan in the game against Maccabi Tel Aviv.
Interim coach Aliniv Barda also suffered a two-game suspension for a verbal confrontation with the referee when he was Aboksis' assistant coach.
Barkat wrote on her Twitter account tonight: "Uniformity. Without expressing any position regarding the provocation or the severity of the sentences given, when we asked prosecutor Nir Reshef for a plea deal for Aliniv Barda (after he apologized and ran an automatic suspension from one game) he refused and insisted he be prosecuted. Wes was prosecuted for "spitting movement" because the plaintiff also did not see spitting, and was removed to 4 games, because must be aggravated because of the corona. Go out and learn. For the plaintiff, a mass brawl and gathering of dozens of people during the corona period is a serious incident that allows a plea deal "The public will see and judge."
Joss was prosecuted for "spitting movement" because the plaintiff also did not see spitting, and was removed for 4 games, because must be aggravated because of the corona.
Go out and learn.
In the eyes of the plaintiff, a mass brawl and crowd gathering of dozens of people during the Corona period is a non-serious incident that allows for a plea deal.
The public will see and judge.
2/2
- Alona Barkat - Alona Barkat (@alonabarkat) February 17, 2021