sport
Israeli soccer
Super League
Reason for Prosecution: Defendant is a football star
The broadcasters consider him a time offender, the reporters relish the recycling of his conviction sheet, every trash talk with him becomes an affair.
Shaul Adar fails to calm down from another move by Joshua, and explains why the blame does not lie only in the phenomenon of the little judges with the big whistle
Tags
Joshua
Hapoel Beer Sheva
Shaul Adar
Thursday, 04 March 2021, 15:00
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
Summary: Maccabi Tel Aviv - Hapoel Haifa 3: 4
Summary: Borussia Mönchengladbach - Borussia Dortmund 1: 0
Summary: PSV Eindhoven - Ajax 1: 1
Summary: Maccabi Petah Tikva - Maccabi Netanya 1: 1
Summary: Shakhtar Donetsk - Maccabi Tel Aviv 0: 1
Summary: Hapoel Beer Sheva - Betar Jerusalem 1: 1
Summary: Maccabi Tel Aviv - MS.
Ashdod 1: 3
Summary: Bnei Sakhnin - Hapoel Haifa 1: 0
Summary: Sheffield United - Liverpool 2: 0
Summary: Panathinaikos - Aris Thessaloniki 72:94
Summary: Crystal Palace - Manchester United 0: 0
Summary: Urbani Kiryat Shmona - Hapoel Beer Sheva 2: 2 (Sport 2)
If there is a drop of decency left in the people and prosecutors of the Football Association, the serious, always serious indictment they will file against Joshua should include only one clause: the defendant is a football star and should therefore be prosecuted.
It is more likely that the court will file a detailed indictment by referee Foxman and the observer from the game in Kiryat Shmona that will include detailed descriptions of events that seem to be at the heart of the hearing but not actually related to it - such as an act with two free balls and a red card - but make no mistake. so.
This is an opportunity to file an indictment against the judges' union for not fulfilling their duties.
Following the game between Kiryat Shmona and Hapoel Beer Sheva reveals that dozens of offenses were committed on the defendant, almost every time he received the ball, in order to stop the flow of the game - as in every league game.
Even if each offense is not serious in itself, such a sequence is an offense in itself and should be punished with a yellow card.
Such a card was actually issued to the defendant, after his first offense which was less blatant than the offenses committed on him.
If the league referees had applied the same penalty to the defendant and those who hit him in every game, every opponent of Hapoel Beer Sheva would have finished the game with a double-digit number of yellow cards.
More on Walla!
Foxman will file a harsh sentencing report, Joshua may face severe punishment
To the full article
He suffered dozens of fouls, almost every time he got the ball.
Joshua yesterday (Photo: Maor Elkelsi)
The second yellow card was taken out after the referee insisted on stopping the game excessively and artificially and the defendant asked to resume it.
The issue also came up in England this week after a Brighton goal disqualification and there was general agreement, even from past referees, that players should be allowed to resume the game quickly.
But this is a technical point, the problem is not a resumption of the game but a violation of the referee's status.
But what to do that the judge's status is so low in his own eyes that every act, banal as it may be, is an injury to him?
A person like Foxman knows that professionally he is not approaching the quality of the defendant.
He does not control the rules of the game (for example, Lucio should have received a yellow card for preventing the free kick from the defendant. Oh the irony), his status does not stem from actual authority or knowledge and therefore everything is naturally perceived by him as an injury.
He is not alone, Judge Shlomi Ben Avraham, who removed Nir Klinger, suffers from the same syndrome.
Little judges with a big whistle.
The judges' union can argue for mitigating reasons, such as the atmosphere.
Every week, the defendant receives recycled articles about his various disciplinary offenses.
During the game broadcasts, the broadcast team deals with him and describes him as a time offender.
Every confrontation with an opposing footballer becomes an affair, every trash talk an opportunity to find dirt, every non-event of the kind that takes place dozens of times in every game, becomes a media event.
The reason is clear: the defendant creates traffic.
In the world of "press stand" and tweet harvesting items, a prominent item on the defendant is the most profitable.
Two minutes of copy and paste and impressive traffic.
Much more effective than a quality desk or sending a reporter to an event.
More on Walla!
Joshua apologizes: "I said those things in emotional turmoil, it was not aimed at the judge"
Foxman will file a harsh sentencing report, Joshua may face severe punishment
Every fan's dream: Joshua continues to be the most interesting player in the league
Suffering from sciatica (sciatica)?
Get to know the natural treatment that overcomes the pain - without leaving home
What to do that the judge's status is so low in his own eyes that every act, banal as it may be, is an injury to him?
Foxman (Photo: Maor Elkelsi)
Yes, the defendant has a past and he was even punished by his group.
But this is the difference: it is impossible to punish him for an entire season on Almog Cohen's elbow.
In fact, it is possible - he has already been convicted of spitting even though no photographic evidence has been presented for this.
The next time one channel or another conducts an article about the disturbed genius from Be'er Sheva, it will also include the last red card, absurd as it may be, as proof of Joshua's problematic nature, and the snowball will continue to roll.
The seagulls follow the fishing boats because they hope sardines will be thrown into the sea, and TFU on you.
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
