• sport

• Israeli soccer

• Super League

Hapoel Haifa: "The committee's decisions are intended to cover up the referees' mistakes"

The Reds sent a letter of complaint following the events against Maccabi Tel Aviv: "Accumulation of discrimination against us. The refereeing decisions decided the game."

Tags

• Hapoel Haifa

• Judges Association

Shlomo Weiss

Sunday, 07 March 2021, 11:49 Updated: 12:00

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments

• Maccabi Haifa fans

• Summary: Burnley - Arsenal 1: 1

• Summary: Vitsa - Venlo 0: 2

• Summary: M.S.

  Ashdod - Hapoel Kfar Saba 0: 2

• Summary: Urbani Kiryat Shmona - Hapoel Beer Sheva 2: 2

• Glasgow Rangers fans are celebrating in the streets

• Summary: Betar Jerusalem - Bnei Sakhnin 3: 2

• Summary: Maccabi Netanya - Bnei Yehuda 0: 1

• Summary: Liverpool - Chelsea 1: 0

• Summary: Hapoel Tel Aviv - Maccabi Haifa 2: 1 (including the goal ...

Summary: Hapoel Haifa - Maccabi Tel Aviv 2: 0 (Sport 1)

CEO of Hapoel Haifa, Pine Sterling, sent a letter of complaint Judges Association on behalf of the club. Recall, after the loss to Maccabi Tel Aviv last Thursday, were outraged when the judgment club owner Yoav Katz instructed his club to transfer a complaint letter.

The letter sent to the Chairman of the Union Judges Yariv Tepper mentioned, among other things, that this is not the first letter of complaint this season and that they claim that the club has suffered for a long time from errors of judgment that cause the results to be decided to its detriment and thus fatally injures him professionally and financially.

"Unfortunately, the world, as is his custom, and the accumulation of Hapoel Haifa's cases of discrimination continues," it was written. .

More on Walla!

The judges' union admits: "We did not decide whether Shahar's gate was rightly disqualified"

To the full article

Hachmon examines one of the events (Photo: Maor Elkelsi)

Among other things, Haifa notes the feeling of deprivation regarding Ido Shachar's goal that was disqualified and the claim that Pendel deserved after Dor Peretz's hand touch inside the extension (the professional committee ruled that the referee and the VAR team were right not to whistle for Pendel).

In contrast, the club argued, the referee went to check on VAR whether Ben Wahbe had touched the ball with his hand in the case where he had received a signal.

In addition, in Haifa they attacked the professional committee and wrote "We respect the committee and are sure that it is staffed by the best referees and professionals, but unfortunately our feeling that its decisions regarding Hapoel Haifa are intended to cover up errors of judgment, as in the case of disqualification The case of Peretz's hand touch. "

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments