The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

PSG-Manchester City (1-2): the ratings of Parisian players

2021-05-01T16:00:42.460Z


Only the Argentinian midfielder Angel Di Maria, impeccable from start to finish, was up to the event against Citizens who tired the


Paris lost.

Despite a quasi-typical team and an opener from Marquinhos, Paris lost to Manchester City (1-2) this Tuesday evening at the Parc des Princes.

Navas: 4.

The Costa Rican had so far gone through the season in the savior outfit.

Vigilant in front of Silva (20th) and especially Foden (42nd) in the first period, he cracked like the others when he returned from the locker room.

The conceded goal on De Bruyne's cross, which left him unresponsive, is largely for him.

He is abandoned by his wall on Mahrez's free kick.

Florenzi: 5.5.

In the first period, the Italian was a treat for his partners, a poison for his opponents.

Defensively, he very rarely saw Foden or Cancelo catch him failing on his right flank.

Quite the opposite of what he did to the English on his offensive inspirations which, especially after his sombrero shot, could have been rewarded with an assist.

More erased when returning from the locker room.

Marquinhos: 6.5.

Affected in the adductors on April 7 in Munich, the Brazilian remained for three weeks without competition.

As in Germany, the captain first carried his own by opening the scoring with a magnificent header (15th).

Then stuck in defense, he cuts the trajectories.

Kimpembe: 4.5.

Again associated with Marquinhos, the French defender had the opportunity to play with his physique, especially in the aerial game.

But in a very low block, he had less opportunity to go out and cut the trajectories than usual.

He departs from the wall on Mahrez's free kick.

Bakker: 5.

Preferred over Diallo and Kurzawa, the Dutchman started a Champions League match for just the third time in his career.

A lack of experience that could have been expensive in front of Silva (20th), who started behind his back.

Author of some faults which offered set pieces to the English, he nevertheless held out against Mahrez.

Paredes: 4.

Like his double tackle in front of Walker and Gündogan (10th), his activity and his commitment in the first half were a source of hope.

Like his partners, the Argentinian sank after returning from the locker room, letting his nerves take over.

Warned for a change of mood (70th), he fades into the wall supposed to stop Mahrez's strike.

Replaced by Herrera (83rd).

Gueye: 4.

Like Paredes, the Senegalese was everywhere during the first 45 minutes.

Indestructible, he swallowed an incredible number of kilometers while going out to harass the carrier.

Also flushed in the second period, he made the mistake that brought Mahrez's victorious free kick and left his team at 10 for an attack on Gündogan.

Di Maria: 7.

The Argentinian had fiery legs.

For an hour he went through this semi-final going on a cloud.

His left paw, which allowed him to sign the 34th assist of his Champions League career, gave Marquinhos the first goal.

Precious in the offensive game, he had a riot of rare and exemplary energy.

Replaced by Danilo (80th).

Verratti: 4.5.

The Italian only had one try, Saturday in Metz, to take his marks with Neymar and Mbappé in the playmaker position that Mauricio Pochettino now seems to want to give him.

Impeccable after a slow start, it disappeared from circulation after rest.

Warned for a bad gesture (74th).

Neymar: 4.5.

The Brazilian ran like never before, displayed unwavering determination, even in the defensive retreat in the first period.

But despite a few paws, he did not have the expected influence on the game.

Mbappé: 3.

In a team that has long left the ball, he has only one center for Verratti to his credit.

One of his worst matches in the Champions League.

Source: leparis

All sports articles on 2021-05-01

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.