sport
Israeli soccer
Super League
Betar Jerusalem: Mahias is expected to return in January, fearing a budget "pit"
The recovery rate of the brake from the fracture in the hand is satisfactory and it will begin training next month.
Against the background of uncertainty: Fear of a budget "pit" of NIS 4 million and the sale of players in January
Tags
Beitar Jerusalem
Joshua Mahias
Ophir Saar
Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 6:30 p.m.
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
Summary: Maccabi Petah Tikva - Betar Jerusalem 3: 0 (Sport 1)
Betar Jerusalem stopper Joshua Mahias, who was injured in the Venezuelan national team game against Brazil and broke his elbow, may be available for Erwin Koeman starting in January. The team is set for January. As
for Michael Ohana, the current work plan is for him to return to the squad after the break, unless he feels unprepared. During the break.
More on Walla!
Slobodan Drapic has been appointed municipal coach of Kiryat Shmona
To the full article
Positive recovery rate.
Mahias (Photo: Danny Maron)
The club is looking towards January with concern, when at this point all the good news from trustee Yitzhak Junger is that owner Moshe Hogg is not going to take money out of his pocket and that means it will end with the release or sale of a player or players. There is currently a "pit" of more than NIS 4 million for this season.
By the way, if in the summer the sale of Aviel Zargari was on the agenda, if Jordan Shua continues with the good ability and seriousness he demonstrates, he may be a hot cucumber in January, when as far as his agent Dudu Dahan is concerned all options are open.
More on Walla!
A well-known model claims: Moshe Hogg is sexually harassing me
To the full article
Will it be sold in January?
Shua (Photo: Udi Citation)
On another issue, a fan of the group who was sued by a senior member of La Familia for defamation, damage to his good name and abusive publicity on the networks, submitted a response letter through her lawyer explaining that "the content of the things published does not defame and can not be defamed" And that "the publicity does not amount to offensive publicity and has not caused the good name of your client any harm, in so far as he has a good name, a matter which requires clarification in itself."
It was also clarified that "my client does not intend to let go, surrender and be afraid of the client's bullying conduct, it will be clarified to the client that the bullying methods of the stand will not hold him water within the walls of the court."
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments