Still a bit of suspense.
The fate of Novak Djokovic is now in the hands of the Australian Federal Court: it is she who will decide whether the number one in world tennis should be expelled from the country.
During an interim hearing in Melbourne on Sunday, the three judges of the Court heard the Australian government's arguments for several hours on Sunday. In his conclusions, Immigration Minister Alex Hawke argued that Djokovic's presence in the country "is likely to pose a health risk". He says it encourages "anti-vaccination sentiment" and could deter Australians from getting their booster shots as the Omicron variant spreads rapidly across the country. The presence in Australia of the champion could even "lead to an upsurge in civil unrest", added the minister. Although he described the risk of Djokovic himself infecting Australians as "negligible",the minister considered that his past “contempt” of the health rules against the Covid constitutes a bad example.
Read alsoDjokovic case: from an Instagram post to a new detention, back in 8 episodes on this incredible saga
Sunday before the Court, the lawyers of "Djoko" qualified the detention of their client and his possible expulsion of "illogical", "irrational" and "unreasonable".
The government "doesn't know what Mr. Djokovic's views are right now," lawyer Nick Wood pleaded, saying his client has never publicly supported the anti-vaccination movement.
Government lawyer Stephen Lloyd responded that the champion's failure to be vaccinated nearly two years into the pandemic and his repeated disregard of health rules, including failing to isolate when he knew he was infected, constituted sufficient proof of his position.
The decision of the three Federal Court judges will be virtually impossible for both the Australian government and Djokovic to challenge.