The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Reverse Psychology: 1: 3 to Hadera vs. Hapoel Jerusalem Israel today

2022-03-21T20:15:19.772Z


The team from the capital, which so needs points in the struggle for survival in the league - did not seem to be fighting for its life • In contrast, Menachem Koretzky's team played as if their future was at stake • Maxim Flakushchenko (18), Amit Moore in the first goal (47) and Menashe Zelka (65 ) Conquered by the host, Onzej Bacho (89) Zimak


Need is a term from the world of psychology, but one does not have to be a psychologist to know that Hapoel Jerusalem, which is engrossed in survival struggles at the bottom and lost tonight (Monday) 3: 1, needs more points than Hapoel Hadera, which has long completed its tasks this season.

It is natural for a person to fight for his need, but Jerusalem did not seem to need points.

Maxim Flakushchenko (18), Amit Moore in the first goal (47) and Menashe Zelka (65).

Her whole room looked like someone whose future depended on this game.

If Hapoel Jerusalem, which only shrank from a goal by Onzej Bacho (89), does not fight for its need for points - it will be relegated.

Luckily, all of her rivals in the fight lost points.

A basic lack of understanding of what they really need.

Is there a psychologist in the audience?

Ziv Arie and Menachem Koretzky.

The smiles changed sides at the end, Photo: Alan Schieber

Ohad Hapoel Jerusalem.

Frustrated return to the capital, Photo: Alan Schieber

Amit Moore with a premiere gate next to the cook Tamir Glazer, Photo: Alan Shiver

Menashe Zelka celebrates the third., Photo: Alan Shiber

Hapoel Jerusalem.

Disintegration in Netanya, Photo: Alan Shiber

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All sports articles on 2022-03-21

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.