The president of the Supreme Court of the Football Association, Amnon Strashnov, this morning (Friday) rejected Maccabi Haifa's request for a further hearing on the punishment imposed on the club - closing the northern stand in the game against Maccabi Tel Aviv.
In Haifa, they claimed that there was no room to use the condition that stood against the club for rioting fans in aggravated circumstances, since the charge was "fan riot only."
Strashnov criticized the conduct of Maccabi Haifa throughout the handling of the case and wrote: The additional hearing institution is not intended to "assign improvements" when a party is not satisfied with the decision of the Supreme Court, but rather sets special and strict conditions for its existence, as detailed above, and these did not exist in this case. "
He also wrote: "The petitioner's claim that" the final decision constitutes silence and a court action "and therefore" the Supreme Court erred in interpreting the decision while it was already a court action and a final decision "- is not acceptable to me, at all.
With all due respect to the use of the terms taken, all of them, from the civil level, we are dealing with disciplinary proceedings in which different rules apply, something.
Maccabi Haifa's response: "The significance of the decision: 2 organizations that are not known for their love for each other sat at a distance of 10 meters. That the police would take responsibility, whoever wanted to fight violence - raised the danger threshold to the highest level."
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us
