The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Roland-Garros: Djokovic-Nadal, the earth will still shake

2022-05-30T18:37:45.511Z


The two legends in search of all records meet this Tuesday in the quarter-finals of Roland-Garros. Djokovic-Nadal, episode 59 of a blockbuster that rarely disappoints. The most disputed duel of the Open era (30 victories for the Serb, 28 for the Spaniard) was born in 2006, at the French Open, already in the quarter-finals (victory for Nadal). Roland-Garros holds its breath, only one year after their last epic duel, already, under the spotlights of the Philippe-Chatrier court. For a new fight of


Djokovic-Nadal, episode 59 of a blockbuster that rarely disappoints.

The most disputed duel of the Open era (30 victories for the Serb, 28 for the Spaniard) was born in 2006, at the French Open, already in the quarter-finals (victory for Nadal).

Roland-Garros holds its breath, only one year after their last epic duel, already, under the spotlights of the Philippe-Chatrier court.

For a new fight of titans.

The two legends had engaged in the semi-final, in the cool Parisian night, in a duel of anthology without the slightest downtime.

The spectators had vibrated, and the curfew then set at 11 p.m. (Covid-19 requires) had jumped.

Djokovic had triumphed (3-6, 6-3, 7-6 (7/4), 6-2) in 4:11. The Spaniard, foot in pain, it is true,

To discover

  • Roland Garros men's singles

  • Roland Garros single ladies

Read also

The top 5 duels Nadal-Djokovic in Grand Slam

This epic duel hardly suffered the comparison with other mythical fights...

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 85% left to discover.

Cultivating your freedom is cultivating your curiosity.

Keep reading your article for €0.99 for the first month

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Login

Source: lefigaro

All sports articles on 2022-05-30

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.