The referees' union confirmed that a penalty did not arrive at Maccabi Tel Aviv, this time the dialogue was not published
The union published its conclusions from the events of the yellow team's match in Ashdod: the penalty is wrong, the disqualification of the goal is justified.
However, this time the conversation between the referee and VAR was not published
Yaniv Tuchman
14/09/2022
Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 6:37 p.m. Updated: 6:44 p.m.
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Twitter
Share by email
Share in general
Comments
Comments
Summary: MS.
Ashdod - Maccabi Tel Aviv 0:0 (Sport1)
The referees union published today (Wednesday) its conclusions from the decisive decisions in the game of Maccabi Tel Aviv against MS.
Ashdod on Saturday, where Maccabi Tel Aviv received a controversial penalty and a winning goal was disallowed in the 89th minute due to a foul.
Regarding the penalty that was whistled in the 13th minute for the alleged foul on Parfa Giagon, the union announced that "it is a wrong decision for a penalty kick. There is no foul. The screen referee should have intervened and advised the referee to examine the incident and cancel the penalty kick."
dramatic events.
Maccabi Tel Aviv in Ashdod (Photo: Liron Moldovan)
Regarding the foul in the 89th minute, it is written: "This is a foul and a justified goal disqualification. Maccabi Tel Aviv player Enrik Savorit is in a foul position and tries to play the ball distinctly and close to the goalkeeper, thereby committing a foul.
As you can see and hear in the video from the screen judging system, there is no certainty as to whether Saborit touched the ball and therefore the case is defined as an 'interpretation event', which requires the arrival of the referee to examine the incident on the screen (OFR - On Field Review).
If there was certainty from the screen referee's point of view that
Saborit touched the ball, the case would have been defined as a 'factual event', in which the referee was not required to reach the screen and only a report by the screen referee was sufficient to disallow the goal (VAR ONLY).
The justifications from the previous cycles, this time in the case of the referee Oral Greenfeld and the person responsible for the VAR David Foxman - the union did not publish the dialogue between the referee on the field and the screen referees from the audio system.
sport
Israeli soccer
Super League
Tags
Maccabi Tel Aviv in football
tax.
Ashdod