In the Indian Judges' Association: it was not possible to check whether he was sworn in a separate position - voila! sport

Maccabi Haifa fans before the match against M.S.

Ashdod (Liron Moldovan)

Maccabi Haifa looked bad again and suffered their fourth loss of the season at the YA Stadium in Ashdod, but it turns out that the only goal they scored in the 3:1 may not have been legal. Still in the middle of the match, they admitted to the referees union that Dia Saba's goal was confirmed despite the possibility that he was in position Different, because the system for checking the lines of difference could not be activated in the same move.

The system worked throughout the game and was found to be working even when the goal was scored, this was not the problem, but due to the limitations that exist in the YA stadium regarding the number of cameras and the positions where they can be placed, no Synchronization was made between the camera and the field lines in the same move and hence the screen referees could not use the system to check the lines.

In the bottom line, since it was not possible to prove whether Saba was standing in the gap or not during the above and in light of the fact that the line did not raise the flag for the gap in real time, the goal was confirmed and Maccabi Haifa benefited from an expensive goal that in the end was not enough for them.

Was he or wasn't he different? (Photo: screenshot, Sport1)

1/1 Dia Saba is probably in a different position, but the goal is confirmed (Photo: Sport1)

Is Dia Saba perceived in a different position?

No, this is a legal gate

Yes, the goal should not have been allowed

317 participants

You are invited to vote in the poll above and express your opinion in the comments to this news.

• sport

• Israeli soccer

• Super League

Tags

• Maccabi Haifa

• Dia Saba