• vehicle

• Car News

The lying policewoman: Still on duty

Despite the filing of the indictment, despite the conclusive evidence and contrary to the permanent orders of the police, Walla! Vehicle learned that the policewoman accused of fabricating reports for drivers is still serving in the position

Tags

• Israel Police

• Traffic report

Walla! Car

Monday, 01 March 2021, 01:06

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments

• Fog in the morning all over the country 6.1.21

• Kia Saltos in Israel

• The new Peugeot 208 in Israel

• Qassem Junction Crossing lanes

• The electric Lexus UX in Israel

• Opel Corsa E in Israel

• Defects in trucks

• What people do while driving

• A flying vehicle

• A Porsche vehicle in a bizarre accident

• BMW R18

• Road test: The new Peugeot 208

Documentation of reporting (Ashdod Municipality)

About a month ago, an indictment was filed against the "lying policewoman from Ashdod" for committing offenses of obstruction of justice and abuse of office, in light of evidence gathered that she wrote false traffic reports for drivers, but information obtained by the Walla system reveals that she still serves in the police.

The organization was allowed to stand in contradiction to the permanent ordinance of the police, which stipulates that a police officer suspected of committing a disgraceful offense and who has confessed in writing to the commission of the offense, or that independent and unequivocal evidence has been found to substantiate the suspicion, will be fired.

In this regard, the Ordinance defines that an offense involving dishonor is defined as having a lack of hand hygiene or a violation of the purity of morals or a violation of the moral standards required of a police officer.

More on Walla!

NEWS

Money extortion, harassment and threats: This is how the lying policewoman from Ashdod acted

To the full article

From the police's standing orders regarding administrative disciplinary measures (Photo: screenshot, screenshot)

In the present case, independent and unequivocal evidence has indeed been revealed - a number of videos that clearly document that on three different occasions, the defendant gave drivers David Nazri, Yossi Maman and Idan Rahimi a false traffic report for NIS 500 for not stopping a pedestrian when crossing It was

inconsistent with the organization's taking administrative measures against a police officer involved in the offense ', which was included in the National Headquarters Ordinance, which states that there was unequivocal and independent evidence establishing the suspicion that a police officer committed a disgraceful offense - on the police The 'escape hatch' that allows the police to stay in the organization relies on another clause in the procedure, which states that "a competent body may not dismiss the police officer for special reasons to be registered."

What are those special reasons? For what reason do the police justify leaving the policewoman in the system? Solid evidence that she wrote false reports to innocent drivers? How is the story of the 'lying policewoman' different from a few other cases in which the police fired the police officers who were indicted? All this is not clear.

From the police procedure "Taking administrative measures against a police officer involved in an offense" (Photo: screenshot, screenshot)

The serious affair was first exposed in Walla Car, which has accompanied its ramifications over the years, including reports that even after the first case, the policewoman continued to serve in traffic police positions and fine drivers for offenses not committed.

When the cases were published in 2018, the police stated in their response that: "The policewoman did act unprofessionally not typical of a policeman in the traffic system and in general - so it was decided to take command measures against her, transfer her from a position in the traffic system and her function will be examined in the future." Accordingly, it does not indicate tens of thousands of police officers who do their job faithfully and save lives every day. "

The indictment was filed after a war led by lawyer Eran Damari, an expert in traffic law, against DIP, who provided her with conclusive evidence regarding the serious offenses she committed but the case was closed by them on the grounds of lack of cooperation on his part. DIP's decision was surprising because it wrote that She has no evidence of the offenses allegedly committed by the Ashdod policewoman, while videos were published in the Walla that indicate that the policewoman was handling offenses against innocent drivers.

In light of their puzzling response, Advocate Damari turned to the Ombudsman for State Representatives in the courts, retired Judge David Rosen, presenting him with all the evidence he had gathered. After watching the videos, Rosen noted that they "support an approach that these are false traffic reports." As a result, DIP again approached Adv. Damari, who passed on the documentation in his possession and the case was reopened, investigations were conducted, testimonies from the complainants were collected and the indictment was filed.

Adv. Eran Damari, "Continued service in the police while charged with crimes, is, as stated, in conflict with police orders and procedures" (Photo: PR)

The most advanced is the most lucrative

Compulsory insurance starting at NIS 54 per month

By the insurance company WE SURE

Purchase >>

According to Adv. Damari, "The continuation of her service in the police while she is charged with crimes is, as stated, in conflict with the police orders and the procedures that they claim in their publication to strengthen the public's trust in her.

"It is clearly inconceivable that a policewoman who acted knowingly and who was indicted for such serious offenses, which is contrary to the police's first duty to serve its citizens while cleaning their hands, will continue to wear police uniforms and hold a position that requires first and foremost honesty and fairness to the public.

" It is appropriate that at the very least, she would share with the victims of the policewoman and the citizens the reason why she decided to deploy this protective umbrella on her and publish what is hidden behind the phrase "privacy of the individual".

It will also be possible for those police officers who have been fired or who are facing a pre-dismissal hearing, to argue against the necessity of individual privacy. "

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments