Death penalty under fire in Oklahoma.
A death row inmate was shaken by vomiting and convulsions during his execution Thursday in Oklahoma (United States), where the executioners used a lethal cocktail suspected of causing excruciating suffering.
John Grant, a 60-year-old African American, was sentenced in 2000 to death for the murder of a prison employee.
After receiving the green light from the Supreme Court of the United States, prison authorities in this conservative southern state injected him with three substances and his death was pronounced at 4:21 p.m. (11:20 p.m. in Paris).
This protocol had already been applied in 2014 and 2015, but the apparent suffering of the detainees led the state to declare a moratorium on executions.
John Grant "began to convulse shortly after injecting the first product," said US agency AP reporter Sean Murphy, who witnessed the scene.
According to him, he convulsed about 20 times and vomited several times before dying.
"I witnessed 14 executions, I had never seen that before," added the journalist.
John Grant had been sentenced to death for killing a prison service job.
(Oklahoma Department of Corrections) AFP or licensors
The condemned man's ordeal immediately aroused strong criticism.
"Oklahoma had sabotaged its last three execution attempts before its six-year hiatus, but apparently learned nothing from that experience," commented Robert Dunham, who heads the Sentencing Information Center. death (DPIC).
"Oklahoma's execution protocol did not work properly"
"For the third time in a row, the Oklahoma execution protocol has not worked properly," added Dale Baich, lawyer for several convicts including John Grant.
"There should be no more executions in Oklahoma until the trial begins in February," which will deal with this specific point, he added.
"The execution of the prisoner Grant was carried out in accordance with the protocols of the correctional services of Oklahoma and without complications", defended in a statement Justin Wolf, the director of the communications of the penitentiary services.
The latter had said a few days ago that their protocol was "humane and efficient" and that the executions could resume. Lawyer Dale Baich, however, stressed that there remained "serious questions" about the pain caused by this lethal cocktail and its compliance with the US Constitution which prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment". Wednesday an appeal court had ruled in his favor and suspended the execution. But the authorities in Oklahoma immediately seized the Supreme Court of the United States to ask it to reverse this decision. Without explaining its reasons, the high court finally gave the green light to execution in extremis. Its three progressive judges, however, made it clear that they disagreed with the Conservative majority.
Read also Abolition of the death penalty in Virginia: five minutes to understand a historic decision
The contested protocol combines a sedative, midazolam, and an anesthetic, believed to prevent pain before the lethal-dose potassium chloride injection.
It had been used in 2014 to execute Clayton Lockett, but the convict had agonized for 43 minutes in apparent pain.
In 2015, another convict, Charles Warner, complained that his "body burned" before dying, the executioners having used a non-compliant product.
The same error was almost reproduced in September 2015 and an execution was postponed at the last minute.
Following these failures, a grand jury opened an investigation and the authorities agreed to suspend the application of the death penalty.
In 2020, they finalized a new protocol and set several execution dates in 2021, starting with that of John Grant.
