Their last request for release, filed on October 18, had little chance of success.
According to our information, it was also rejected by the judge of freedoms and detention.
But Cédric Jubillar's lawyers, as they had promised, did appeal to the investigative chamber of the Toulouse Court of Appeal.
According to several lawyers involved in this case, the hearing will take place on Tuesday, November 16. Anxious to maintain their pressure on the judicial authorities, Jean-Baptiste Alary, Emmanuelle Franck and Alexandre Martin intend in any case to use this public hearing to again spread the idea that Cédric Jubillar is in no way involved in the disappearance of his wife Delphine Jubillar in Cagnac-les-Mines (Tarn) and that the charges against him remain, according to them, notoriously insufficient.
Indicted on June 18 for “murder by spouse”, Cédric Jubillar is still placed in solitary confinement in pre-trial detention since that date at the Toulouse-Seysses (Haute-Garonne) remand center.
His lawyers appealed for the first time against the remand order.
The hearing took place on July 6.
Then they filed a first release request (DML) at the end of August, the rejection of which they appealed.
The hearing this time took place on September 14.
It will therefore be the third judicial "lap" for the trio of the defense with on the merits, constant arguments.
Re-examination on December 3
In recent weeks, no new expert feedback has, to date, been included in the file. The latest return dates back to mid-October with the negative result of the analysis of the water in the siphon of the washing machine. No trace, human or animal, of urine, blood or fecal matter, would then have been detected. An important element since this washing machine had been used to clean a duvet on which (or under which) Delphine Jubillar could have lay down during the night of December 15 to 16, 2020. To justify the very astonishing washing of this duvet in the context of the disappearance of his wife, Cédric Jubillar had explained that his dogs would have urinated or defecated on it.
The 34-year-old plaster painter will have the opportunity to explain himself on this point as on so many others before the investigating judges on December 3.
A new interrogation is in fact scheduled for this date, a month and a half after the first interrogation, organized on October 15, which focused on elements of the context and on the journey of this couple in the process of separation at the time of the facts. .
