The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The diamond in the crown - Walla! culture

2022-02-12T22:35:47.153Z


"Spencer" is the best film of the past year the jewel in the crown "Spencer," starring Kristen Stewart as Princess Diana, is the opposite of "The Crown" - not a routine period drama, but a sort of artistic and stylish horror film that is not only spectacular, but also brilliant and moving. The result is challenging, but turns out to be the best film of the past year Avner Shavit 10/02/2022 Thursday, 10 February 2022, 00:47 Updated: Frid


the jewel in the crown

"Spencer," starring Kristen Stewart as Princess Diana, is the opposite of "The Crown" - not a routine period drama, but a sort of artistic and stylish horror film that is not only spectacular, but also brilliant and moving.

The result is challenging, but turns out to be the best film of the past year

Avner Shavit

10/02/2022

Thursday, 10 February 2022, 00:47 Updated: Friday, 11 February 2022, 03:34

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on WhatsApp

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Email

  • Share on general

  • Comments

    Comments

Star rating for movies - 5 stars (Photo: image processing,.)

Princess Diana was an icon in her life, and remained so even in her death.

The amazing thing is not only the amount of works made about her about half a century after she perished in an accident, but also how different they are from each other: "Diana" was a musical;

The "crown" is the "crown";

"The Princess," a fresh documentary about her character, consists solely of archival footage starring her;

And "Spencer," a feature film coming to us this weekend, is something completely different.



The film made its world premiere at the Venice Film Festival last summer.

Indeed, it turns out to be a classic festival film - artistic, stylish and challenging.

"The Crown," in short, it is not, nor is any other routine biographical period drama.

So what is it?



If I had to delimit "Spencer" within the confines of one genre, I would define it as a kind of horror film, not scary but definitely dark, featuring a folk tale about a kind-hearted princess and an evil queen.

This tale is made up of two parts - imprisonment and redemption.

Both take place in one of the estates of the British royal family, as it spends the Christmas of 1991, when the marriage of Diana and Charles has already completely disintegrated, and the tension between her and his family has reached its peak.

The princess and the lens.

From "Spencer" (Photo: Lev Cinema)

The first part describes how Diana suffers from this golden cage.

Queen Elizabeth II conveys a variety of different and strange rituals.

Among other things, she forces her to stand on the weight to check if she has gained a few grams, and further intensifies her eating disorders.

Charles, whose affair with Camila Parker Bulls was already known at the time, humiliates her in his way.

The claustrophobic atmosphere presses on her, and ghosts of previous royal women who suffered before her haunt her.

The choke ring tightens around her neck, and the only ones who show compassion towards her and allow her to cling to life are the servants, the only ones in the environment with a hint of humanity.



The second part describes how the princess manages to free herself from the evil queen and the evil prince, regain her freedom and escape the cruel fate that awaited her - at least temporarily.

Together, the pieces make up what is to me the best film of the past year.

It was a pulsating cinematic year, and "Spencer" is the crown jewel.



The brilliant script was written by the veteran Stephen Knight, who signed, among other things, the series "The Birmingham Gang", and who carried it out is the Chilean director Pablo Larin.

"Spencer" is the second episode in a trilogy of films by him, which deal with tragic cultural heroines.

The previous episode, "Jackie," dealt with Jackie Kennedy, and there were already those who asked the filmmaker if he would dedicate the third episode to Britney Spears, but apparently he would go in a different direction.



Like "Jackie", "Spencer" also boasts an impressive production design, costumes full of style and spectacular aesthetics in general, but of course that's not enough.

After all, "Jackie", despite all these virtues, was a problematic film.

So what allows the second episode of the trilogy to surpass it?

First of all, because his script is coherent, witty and much brighter, and manages to justify the preoccupation with the worn-out icon, but also for two other reasons.

From the movie "Spencer" (Lev Cinema)

The first reason is Kristen Stewart, who plays Diana, and in a normal world she was one and only Oscar favorite.

Many actresses, for example Natalie Portman in "Jackie", were content with a paper-rich imitation of the icon they play.

She, on the other hand, does not at all try to emulate the character, but simply recreates it and does so in a mesmerizing and inspiring way.



But with all due respect to the great Stuart, the real star of the film is a different craftsman: the French photographer Claire is moderate, one of the most talented photographers working today.



On the one hand, Moderate does a good job of bringing the camera closer to the princess, creating a rare intimacy with her and allowing us to feel everything she goes through;

On the other hand, it is also astonishing to broaden the perspective, and turn "Spencer" into an abstract and powerful tale, dealing with much larger and more universal issues - motherhood, femininity and independence, for example.

Thanks to the way she photographs Diana and everything around her,



To all these must be added the works of actors and supporting actresses, some of the best there are on the British Isles, for example Sally Hawkins;

The music of Johnny Greenwood, who did an exemplary job this year also in "The Power of the Dog";

And the fact that over its ninety minutes, the film gets better and better and progresses in honor of a wonderfully moving ending.

Not a myth, not an icon.

Woman, mother.

From "Spencer" (Photo: Lev Cinema)

This suffix also allows us to understand why Larin, unlike other creators who have dealt with the subject in recent years, did not call the film "Diana" or "The Princess" but simply "Spencer", as his protagonist's original last name, before marrying the royal family.



On the face of it, it seems at first that the film is complicit in turning its protagonist into a mythology, but then it turns out that he is striving to do the opposite.

Diana eludes him during the golden cage in which they tried to lock her up, and also from the persona they tried to force on her.

She is released and set free - away from the royal house and away from the kind of storm, to a place where there will be no icon, but a mortal;

A place where there will not be "Princess Diana", but simply Spencer.



Biographical films about characters who no longer usually end in death, but this film is only interested in the life of Diana Spencer.

He allows her, at the last moment of grace, to live them, discover herself and understand who she is.

When watching it does so,

  • culture

  • Theater

  • Movie review

Tags

  • Princess Diana

  • Pablo Larin

  • Kristen Stewart

Source: walla

All tech articles on 2022-02-12

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.