The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Seriously injured after accident: Drunk passenger is liable

2022-03-10T08:04:25.271Z


Seriously injured after accident: Drunk passenger is liable Created: 03/10/2022 08:57 Is the passenger who is seriously injured in an accident under the influence of alcohol partly to blame? According to a judgment from Schleswig, yes. © Patrick Seeger/dpa In an accident under the influence of alcohol, the drunk passenger is also seriously injured and demands compensation from the driver - is h


Seriously injured after accident: Drunk passenger is liable

Created: 03/10/2022 08:57

Is the passenger who is seriously injured in an accident under the influence of alcohol partly to blame?

According to a judgment from Schleswig, yes.

© Patrick Seeger/dpa

In an accident under the influence of alcohol, the drunk passenger is also seriously injured and demands compensation from the driver - is he successful?

If you sit next to a drunk driver*, you are liable for your injuries after a traffic accident - usually up to a third.

The fact that a passenger was heavily intoxicated himself does not change that.

This is shown by a judgment (case no.: 7 U 2/20) by the Schleswig Higher Regional Court, to which the Traffic Law Working Group of the German Lawyers' Association (DAV) refers.

In the specific case, it was about a man who had already drunk considerable amounts of alcohol with the later driver on the afternoon of the day of the accident.

Both worked on the driver's garage door and then drove the car to a restaurant.

Serious accident early in the morning

The two drove off early in the morning, the later plaintiff as a passenger.

The trip ended at excessive speed in a collision with an agricultural vehicle.

The driver was found to be 1.68 per thousand and the passenger 1.71 per thousand.

He suffered serious injuries in the accident and was no longer able to work as a self-employed metalworker, even after a long period of inpatient treatment.

First, the driver's insurance company paid compensation of 30,000 euros and a further 10,000 euros as a freely offsettable advance.

The man demanded a total of 95,000 euros, also because of the permanent damage he had suffered.

The insurance company accused the man of knowing or at least realizing that the driver was drunk.

He was also not wearing a seat belt at the time of the accident.

also read

Noise pollution does not justify physical violence

Noise can definitely annoy residents of apartment buildings.

But one should not lose one's nerves because of this.

Because that can end up being expensive.

Noise pollution does not justify physical violence

Drunk asleep behind the wheel

A drunk driver fell asleep behind the wheel with the engine running.

The car was in the middle of a street in Bad Liebenzell (Calw district), the police said on Friday.

Officers found the man Thursday night after a citizen reported a motionless person in the car.

A breath alcohol test showed 1.8 per thousand.

Drunk asleep behind the wheel

Also read:

When does the mask requirement for the car first aid kit apply?

The injured party is liable for one third

The man argued he hadn't realized the driver was drunk.

He testified that he spent most of the time in the restaurant in the restroom with gastrointestinal problems.

Courts had to clarify.

The district court partially agreed.

The man had to be held responsible for one-third of the crime, so he was only entitled to around 43,000 euros.

And future damage can only be compensated for by two-thirds.

The court found that the plaintiff was not wearing a seat belt.

He also violated self-care when he got on the drunk.

The fact that he himself was also under the influence of alcohol did not stand in the way of his complicity.

Also interesting:

mopeds or e-scooters: when will the new insurance indicator be mandatory for 2022?

Too drunk to recognize the driver's unfitness to drive

As a further instance, the Higher Regional Court confirmed the verdict.

The investigations of an expert underpinned: The plaintiff had not been buckled.

It was also confirmed that the driver was at fault, since the man got into the car with a "visibly drunk driver".

The objection that he did not want to have recognized that of the driver due to his own heavy alcohol consumption did not change that.

The court ruled that negligent.

By drinking alcohol, he had put himself in a state in which one no longer had the insight required for self-protection.

(dpa) *tz.de is an offer from IPPEN.MEDIA.

Source: merkur

All tech articles on 2022-03-10

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-24T07:34:05.582Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.