They tell about a British journalist who rushed to report in 1883 the death of the famous writer Victor Hugo.
There was one problem with it: Hugo wasn't dead.
Two years later, when the famous French creator really returned his soul to the Creator, the same British journalist proudly declared: "I was the first to publish about Hugo's death."
I remembered a story about this yesterday when on the Twitter page of "Khan Haudas" they rushed to report on a driver who was attacked at the high-tech demonstration in Tel Aviv.
In the attached video, you could clearly see that the driver is the one who goes out to attack the protesters, but who knows, maybe one day high-tech people will really violently attack passers-by - and then the social media people at the corporation will be able to say that they were the first to post about it.
To the credit of the "Kan" news people, who are in the spotlight at the moment anyway, the incident was reported in a much more decent manner as soon as it left Twitter and reached the TV screen of Channel 11. The education and technology reporter Itai Shikman frames the story appropriately, clarifying that it is a small one-off incident In which "the driver went out to the demonstrators, approached them and they confronted him" - and continued to report on the demonstrations that were held yesterday in several locations, and especially on their meaning.
But it was already too late.
On the social networks, they have already started telling about a lynching (!) by Heitkists in the right of an innocent person who accidentally got into a demonstration.
More sophisticated users told about Ashkenazi who attacked Mizrahi, as if no Mizrahi work in high-tech.
The increase made Channel 13, one of the two largest and most influential channels in the country, which is undergoing an internal cannibalization process in which populist forces are trying to diminish and harm the good name of the channel's journalists, and especially the "News 13" brand itself.
How many people even know that the show "Five with Sharon Gal" is not part of the channel's news unit?
How easy it is to get confused, certainly when the program is hosted by senior journalists of the channel such as Baruch Kara and Aviad Glickman.
10 minutes for an item about a demonstration that attracted several hundred people?
Sharon Gal opens another embarrassing program (photo: screenshot, network 13)
Sharon Gal's plan looks like an attempt to bypass Channel 14 from the right.
Sometimes she even succeeds, not an easy feat given the circumstances.
In fact, in particularly embarrassing moments, such as the one in which Sharon Gal explains that he felt "under foreign rule" during the Bennet-Lapid government, or in another case in which he emphatically made it clear to Aviad Glickman that "the days when you set the standard are over," referring to Deri's disqualification from the post of Minister By the High Court of Justice - It is hard to believe that our television is not currently tuned to channel 14. The
fact that the program is skewed to the right, and opens with a (really) entertaining monologue by Gal on the affairs of the day while making justified jabs at the heads of the opposition using archive clips, is really not its biggest problem. Gal He is a television wizard, there is no doubt about that - and when he wants to, he knows how to make excellent television, according to "Lila Calcal" the 4th. The problem begins with Gal trying to create a fictitious agenda, which is based on fake news and banter - all under the guise of a news program serious
"Let him leave the city": the neighbors of the brother who raped Hila Tzur are protesting in front of his house
, it is simply impossible to trust the judgment of the "90s show"
The opening item of the program was the same video of a marginal incident from the demonstration in Tel Aviv.
A violent and ugly incident by all accounts - that ended in a torn shirt, and nothing more.
It is clear who started it, it is clear who finished it.
It is also clear that nothing happened there to justify starting a current affairs program with her.
However, Gal chose to show the incident from an angle where the driver is not seen getting out of the vehicle in order to confront the protesters, when his face is blurred.
The rest of the video is even less clear, but the caption on the background was clear: "A driver was attacked at the left-wing demonstration in Tel Aviv".
This is a double lie. First, it is not a left-wing demonstration but a demonstration by some of the workers of the high-tech industry, not the most socialist branch of labor in Israel, who entered the scene The protest for the simple reason: they claim that the government's planned damage to local democracy will result in damage to investments in Israeli high-tech. The second lie, as mentioned, is the same attempt to present that unfortunate and unnecessary incident that lasts less than ten seconds as some violent lynching by an enraged mob.
These two lies are essential to the continuation of the item, the whole purpose of which is to link the "attack" with "inflammatory statements in the media and by some politicians".
In order to examine the photos objectively and properly, Sharon Gal turned to the senior legal commentator by his side, Haim Ramon, who was previously convicted of committing an indecent act and later sued women who dared to call him a "sex offender" in good faith (they probably mistakenly thought that someone convicted of a sex offense was a "sex offender" ").
Gal asked Ramon to analyze the "very sad photos", and Ramon fulfilled his role successfully, perhaps too successfully: "The photos are the result of people being read innocently in all the mainstream media... They unfortunately do not see this program, and certainly not Channel 14."
Sharon Gal interrupted him and clarified: "We see, we see, thank God, everything is good", but a small truth stood upright in the studio at that moment.
Ramon revealed the biggest secret of this program:
good to know (in advance)
The secret to improving your sex life - now in a special sale
Served on behalf of "Gabra"
100% anti-Maccabi versus 100% pro-democracy?
wait, what?
Haim Ramon commentator (photo: screenshot, network 13)
Ramon, whose distaste for the justice system is no less than that of Levin's rival, continued to explain why people go out to demonstrate, while bringing a far-fetched analogy from the worlds of football.
"It's like the Hapoel Ultras who say 'We are 100% Maccabi'... If you are not 100% anti-Maccabi you are a Maccabiist, and as a Maccabiist... you know what the Ultras think of Maccabiists."
Did you understand?
Did you not understand?
Not bad, anyway this whole program is in one big offside.
in the small
Immediately after Sharon Gal's program, "Shesh" began with Matan Khodorov, where four minutes were removed from the edition to refer to a lawyer from Netanya named Eran, who is in the habit of sending derogatory messages to journalists, including journalists from News 13. He called Or Heller "more racist than Hitler." ;
He wrote to Aviad Glickman that his wife and children would not be able to walk around the street;
For Lior Keenan he wished that in her first pregnancy "you will miscarry and die in childbirth";
While to Khodorov himself, he wrote "What do you want to hang on a rope? LGBT people fucking eat ass." Khodorov read all these difficult quotes out loud, without emotion and without manipulation.
Later, Khodorov called the same lawyer, and demonstrated in a short conversation, without arguing, how easy it is to be a bully behind a keyboard, and how quickly that bully turns into a rabbit as soon as he has to deal with the man he insulted behind a screen.
I wonder if there is a connection between the five o'clock program that tells us that the violence in Israeli society is the fault of the media, to the fact that at six o'clock we are told about journalists who are abducted by ugly and violent blasphemies on social networks.
culture
TV
TV review
Tags
Sharon Gal
Channel 14
Channel 13
Haim Ramon
Matan Khodorov
