The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

AI Art: No copyrights for Midjourney comics

2023-02-23T14:27:01.146Z


Is an artificial intelligence creative or just a tool in the hands of an artist? A US authority has confirmed: Copyright protection only exists for the result of human creation.


Enlarge image

Cover picture of the comic: The AI ​​is named as the author

Photo:

Kris Kashtanova / Midjourney

The current debate about artificial intelligence raises new questions for many creative workers: Who is actually the artist when an AI was used to help in the creation process?

And what about copyright when an AI has created an image based on a human idea?

The US Copyright Office has now clarified: Artists can use image generators to create new works.

But if they want to be registered as authors, they have to do it again themselves.

The current decision was about the comic publication »Zarya of the Dawn« by Kris Kashtanova.

While the MidJourney image generator is featured on the album's cover, Kashtanova did not specifically state how the artificial intelligence was used in the original registration.

After the fact was raised in social media posts, the US Copyright Office ordered a review.

An image generator is not a brush or a camera

In the 29-page decision, the copyright experts closely followed the process of creating the comic and also looked at how the image generator used worked.

According to the lawyers' opinion, it is not enough for a human to choose between the different results that the software delivers.

"The fact that the outcome is unpredictable distinguishes Midjourney from other tools used by artists from a copyright perspective," the letter reads.

Therefore, the "traditional elements of authorship" of the generated images lie with the algorithms and not with the people who give them text specifications.

However, Kashtanova does not have to do without copyright protection completely.

The plot of the comic is still the work of a human creator, as are the images, which were subsequently modified with an image editing program.

The result: While the comic's old registration is revoked, the Copyright Office issues a modified registration that spells out exactly what is protected about the comic.

Kashtanova herself sees the decision as a success, as the agency has approved many collaborative practices between human artists and artificial intelligence.

Now she wants to look for arguments to be able to register the pictures themselves as an expression of her own artistic work.

The question unanswered by the Copyright Office is to what extent image generators encroach on the rights of artists whose works were used to teach the algorithms.

There are currently several lawsuits being filed by artists and picture agencies that are intended to clarify this fundamental question.

tmk/Reuters

Source: spiegel

All tech articles on 2023-02-23

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-07T09:55:38.111Z
Life/Entertain 2024-02-27T16:43:46.163Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.