04/27/2021 12:55 AM
Clarín.com
Politics
Updated 04/27/2021 12:59 AM
On the edge of the deadlines, the Government presented its arguments before the Supreme Court of Justice with which it wants to suspend the face-to-face classes in the City and leave the restriction decree issued by Alberto Fernández in force.
The presentation was made by the Treasury Attorney, Carlos Zannini, around 23 on Monday, in a presumable strategy to extend the deadlines to the limit, whose
stipulated expiration dates were this Tuesday morning
.
In a document of more than 100 pages, the Government argued its position to refute those already presented by the City team, headed by the Buenos Aires attorney
Gabriel Astarloa
, representing the Horacio Rodríguez Larreta administration.
"It is evident that
the protection of public health and life
justifies the limitation of the right to circulate," Zannini's team argues in the brief.
And he clarifies: "The restriction is not
intended to affect the right to education
, as
the plaintiff alleges
maliciously
(for the City), but to reduce circulation, which necessarily entails the restriction of certain activities that involve the concentration of people; as well as also,
suspend for a temporary period
l the presence of the classes ".
In the official document, they also request that the Court cite the Buenos Aires government of Axel Kicillof as
"third party of the forced intervention
.
"
And also that the highest court "
rejects
both the request for a precautionary measure" presented by the Government of Buenos Aires and the "demand filed."
Zannini's brief is
113 pages long
and bears the signature of the State's attorneys, Carolina Maidana, Axel Monsech Páez and Santiago Herrera, as well as that of Attorney K, who would have delayed the judicial presentation as part of a procedural strategy.
News in development
DS
Look also
War for the schools: Carlos Zannini delays his response and parents join in favor of Horacio Rodríguez Larreta
The pandemic and the political rift, at the worst moment