The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The Government presented its arguments before the Supreme Court of Justice to suspend face-to-face classes in the City

2021-04-29T01:09:51.200Z


Attorney Carlos Zannini did it late on Monday. The deadline was Tuesday morning.


04/27/2021 12:55 AM

  • Clarín.com

  • Politics

Updated 04/27/2021 12:59 AM

On the edge of the deadlines, the Government presented its arguments before the Supreme Court of Justice with which it wants to suspend the face-to-face classes in the City and leave the restriction decree issued by Alberto Fernández in force.

The presentation was made by the Treasury Attorney, Carlos Zannini, around 23 on Monday, in a presumable strategy to extend the deadlines to the limit, whose

stipulated expiration dates were this Tuesday morning

.

In a document of more than 100 pages, the Government argued its position to refute those already presented by the City team, headed by the Buenos Aires attorney

Gabriel Astarloa

, representing the Horacio Rodríguez Larreta administration.

"It is evident that

the protection of public health and life

justifies the limitation of the right to circulate," Zannini's team argues in the brief.

And he clarifies: "The restriction is not

intended to affect the right to education

, as

the plaintiff alleges

maliciously

(for the City), but to reduce circulation, which necessarily entails the restriction of certain activities that involve the concentration of people; as well as also,

suspend for a temporary period

l the presence of the classes ".

In the official document, they also request that the Court cite the Buenos Aires government of Axel Kicillof as

"third party of the forced intervention

.

"

And also that the highest court "

rejects

both the request for a precautionary measure" presented by the Government of Buenos Aires and the "demand filed."

Zannini's brief is

113 pages long

and bears the signature of the State's attorneys, Carolina Maidana, Axel Monsech Páez and Santiago Herrera, as well as that of Attorney K, who would have delayed the judicial presentation as part of a procedural strategy.

News in development

DS

Look also

War for the schools: Carlos Zannini delays his response and parents join in favor of Horacio Rodríguez Larreta

The pandemic and the political rift, at the worst moment

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2021-04-29

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.