The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Transgender athletes: the United States Supreme Court invited to intervene in the debate

2023-03-11T08:29:06.862Z


The case relates to a law passed in 2021 by West Virginia that prohibits students defined as "male" on the basis of their "biology at birth" from joining women's competitions.


The Supreme Court of the United States was asked on Friday March 10 to intervene in the case of a transgender girl who wants to join the women's running team at her college.

This is the first time that the high court has been called upon to rule on the place of transgender athletes in women's sport, a very political debate that is raging throughout the United States.

Concretely, the file concerns a law adopted in 2021 by West Virginia which, like several other conservative states, prohibits students defined as “males”

on

the basis of their “

biology at birth

” from joining female competitions.

As soon as it was passed, the law was challenged in court by Becky Pepper-Jackson, a transgender girl, then 11 years old, who wanted to get on her school's cross-country team.

After several twists and turns, a federal appeals court decided on February 22 to freeze the law while waiting to examine the merits of the case.

West Virginia then turned urgently to the Supreme Court to ask it to lift this blockage, so that its law could apply as long as the procedure continues.

"

In recent years, biological males who identify as female have increasingly beaten biological females in women's competitions

," she wrote in her appeal, asking the court to "

protect fairness

" in women's sports.

Read alsoTransgender: "By ceasing to take into account the specificities of women, we are selling off women's sport"

West Virginia "

talks about elite athletic competitions, which has nothing to do

" with Becky Pepper-Jackson's case, retorted several associations that support her - including the powerful ACLU - in a press release.

When the teenager was able to participate in women's races "

she often finished in the last

" but "

her mother has never seen her so happy

", had underlined her lawyers in a court document.

The Supreme Court is not called upon to rule on the merits at this stage and could simply confirm or reverse the decision of the Court of Appeal without saying more.

So far, she has avoided getting into legal battles over transgender rights, except for a ruling on workplace discrimination: In 2020 she vindicated a funeral home that fired a transgender employee after her transition.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2023-03-11

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-26T17:54:22.279Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.