The Limited Times

Pensions: why the Constitutional Council rejected the first RIP and could do the same with the second

4/15/2023, 5:12:58 PM


INTERVIEW – After having invalidated a first request for a referendum of shared initiative filed by the left, the Elders will have to decide on a second on May 3.

Benjamin Morel is a lecturer in public law at the University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas.

LE

FIGARO.- Why did the Constitutional Council reject on Friday the request for a referendum of shared initiative filed by the parliamentary left in March?

Benjamin MOREL.-

The Council criticizes the text of the referendum of shared initiative proposed by the left-wing opposition for not representing a reform according to article 11 of the Constitution, which provides for a restricted scope of the referendum in its matters.

Among them, the left presented its text as "

reform relating to the economic, social or environmental policy of the nation

".

However, the term “

reform

” implies that the text modifies the state of the existing law.

One does not reform by proposing the identical.

However, here, the text merely recalled the state of the law.

At this point, you are probably saying to yourself that it is absurd, because precisely the pension bill sets this age at 64… However, it is precisely…

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 83% left to discover.

Want to read more?

Unlock all items immediately.

TEST FOR €0.99

Already subscribed?

Login