The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Debt negotiation: IMF warns that 'there are differences of opinion' within the Argentine Government

2021-04-08T18:34:36.810Z


Alejandro Werner, the head of the agency for the Western Hemisphere, acknowledged that there is "uncertainty" and that the negotiations "were stretched more than expected."


04/08/2021 15:20

  • Clarín.com

  • Economy

Updated 04/08/2021 3:20 PM

The

Argentine government's negotiations

with the International Monetary Fund for the restructuring of the

mega loan of US $ 45,000 million 

that the organization made to the country in 2018 seem to follow different strategies.

While the Casa Rosada expressed a slightly more intransigent position last month, the Minister of Economy, Martín Guzmán, seeks to bring positions closer to reaching an agreement.

Now, an IMF official affirmed that the organization perceives that tension: "It seems that there

are significant differences of opinion within the political alliance

of President Fernández about the direction they should take, both with regard to politics and negotiations with the Fund, ”said Alejandro Werner, the agency's chief for the Western Hemisphere.

Werner acknowledged that

the conclusion is taking longer than expected

to be reached and referred to the debt swap that the country carried out last September as a process that

still generates uncertainty.

In a virtual conference organized by S&P, he affirmed that Werner affirmed that although the

relationship with the government "is constructive

", the negotiations "have taken longer" than expected.

“We are working to be ready

when the Government wants to finish it

and accelerate it.

I think we

are in a position to do it

, but it is true that the negotiations have taken longer than perhaps we thought ... to be ready in the first half of this year, "he said, adding:" There is an interpretation on our part of that

perhaps the Government

feels that (it will be) much better to

undertake this political negotiation after the elections and not before

”, the official acknowledged.

Regarding the market's interpretation of the strength of the debt that the country restructured in 2020, reflected in the depressed prices of Argentine bonds, which are already trading around US $ 30 cents, 

 Werner said: "There is still a lot of uncertainty

about the path of Argentina's economic policy to make the country's debt sustainable "and explained:" There are always at least two legs in any restructuring. One is how the terms of the debt contracts

are changed

, the other is

how

the terms of the debt contracts

are changed. policies so that the new debt is sustainable

. And I think that in this second stage is where we have a lot of uncertainty "

Werner's statements came almost at the same time that the Minister of Economy,

Martín Guzmán,

spoke at the

Plenary meeting of the IMF Committee

, where he called for the

reallocation of SDRs

and

suspension of surcharges

for middle-income countries.

"Argentina strongly supports the new general allocation of SDRs in the amount of

US $ 650,000 million.

This will help to provide developing

countries with the liquidity they so badly need

," Guzmán said, noting: "A

suspension

of interest rate

surcharges

in IMF loan programs it

would help countries in difficulty

. "

At that point, Guzmán referred to the successful swap he spearheaded last year and said: "

Argentina restructured its debt despite the 2020 crisis

. At the beginning of the negotiations, we requested technical assistance from the IMF and the analysis carried out contributed to a process orderly and better anchored sovereign debt restructuring process. After a few months, we were able to reach an agreement and

there will be no litigation in the future,

"said the Minister.

Guzmán

resumed the request that the G24 countries

made at the beginning of the week to review the policy of surcharges for debt interest, something that affects developing nations.

"It is very important to have a

review of the IMF's Access Limits and Surcharges Policy.

Today, it penalizes countries in the most adverse circumstances, is regressive and pro-cyclical," he said, adding: "This policy should be reviewed and, meanwhile, a suspension of surcharges would help countries in difficulty, "he said. 

Look also

With the new restrictions on the activity: is the IFE coming back or not?

The United States announced that it will help Argentina amid the second wave of the coronavirus

Source: clarin

All business articles on 2021-04-08

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.