The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Uber is paying tens of thousands of disabled customers compensation

2022-07-18T21:10:06.329Z


Because it took more than two minutes to board an Uber vehicle, customers with disabilities had to pay "waiting fees." For the US judiciary, the case is clear: discrimination.


Enlarge image

US ride-hailing service: Uber

Photo: Mark Lennihan/ AP

The US ride-hailing service Uber is paying millions of dollars in compensation to tens of thousands of customers with disabilities.

The company agreed to a settlement in a lawsuit alleging discrimination, the US Department of Justice said.

The procedure was about "waiting fees" that passengers with disabilities had to pay because they needed more time to board.

Since 2016, Uber has charged a driver if a driver waits more than two minutes for a passenger to board.

The US Department of Justice saw this as illegal discrimination against people with disabilities, some of whom need more time to board.

In November, the ministry therefore filed a lawsuit against the car service provider in a California court.

As part of the settlement, Uber will issue credits to more than 65,000 riders for twice the amount of the requested waiting fee.

The company is also paying more than $1.7 million to passengers who complained about the fare.

“People with disabilities shouldn't feel like second-class citizens or be penalized because of their disabilities.

But that's exactly what Uber has done with its waiting fee policy," said Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department.

Uber said it was "pleased" with the comparison.

The company announced that new rules had already been introduced beforehand.

Accordingly, the waiting fees for passengers with disabilities are now automatically eliminated.

jpa/afp

Source: spiegel

All business articles on 2022-07-18

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.