The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Gas crisis: RWE demands compensation from Gazprom

2022-12-06T07:39:38.617Z


After Uniper, RWE now also wants money from Gazprom. The German supplier had to buy expensive gas in the summer after the Russian state-owned company cut back on its deliveries.


Enlarge image

RWE headquarters in Essen

Photo: THILO SCHMUELGEN / REUTERS

After the energy group Uniper, the Essen-based utility RWE is now also demanding compensation from the Russian Gazprom group for the lack of gas deliveries.

RWE has initiated arbitration proceedings against Gazprom, the company said, but gave no details.

Uniper initiated arbitration proceedings against Gazprom in Stockholm last week.

The group, which is about to be nationalized, had estimated the financial damage caused to the company by expensive replacement purchases for Russian gas at 11.6 billion euros.

Uniper is by far Gazprom's largest German customer.

The amount in dispute in the case of RWE is therefore likely to be significantly lower.

The "Handelsblatt" quotes the analyst Guido Hoymann from Metzler Bank with the assessment that losses at RWE may be less than one billion euros.

Gazprom, like Uniper, withdrew its demands.

It is unclear whether there will be any proceedings at all.

According to Uniper CEO Klaus-Dieter Maubach, both parties must agree on an arbitrator.

If Gazprom refuses, it won't work.

Maubach said it owed it to shareholders, employees and German taxpayers to take legal action.

If necessary, Uniper will go before German courts.

The Leipzig-based gas group VNG, which was also hit hard by the Russian supply freeze, did not want to comment on whether it is also seeking proceedings against Gazprom.

“We are examining all options,” was all they said there.

ssu/Reuters

Source: spiegel

All business articles on 2022-12-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.