The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Electricity production: the Court of Auditors considers that the government tax is “not fair”

2024-03-15T10:56:42.401Z

Highlights: The Court of Auditors estimates that the government tax on electricity producers is "not fair" The government was accused in 2022 of not doing enough to fight against the "superprofits" of companies. The yield from the CRI and the increase in royalties from hydroelectric concessions should “not exceed six billion euros for the years 2022 and 2023” The government has so far not reacted to the criticisms of the Court ofAuditors. The institution suggests to the Ministry of Ecological Transition and Bercy to “propose to Parliament to change the scope and methods of calculating the C RI”


This tax was the government's shocking argument, accused in 2022 of not doing enough to fight against the "superprofits" of companies.


The tax is unprofitable and therefore “not fair for consumers”.

This is what the Court of Auditors estimated this Friday, which criticized the “contribution” implemented by the government to try to capture the “rent” of electricity producers.

This was the shocking argument of the government, accused in 2022 of not doing enough to fight against the “superprofits” of companies having benefited from the surge in energy prices after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

But the “contribution on the inframarginal rent” (CRI) of electricity producers does not generate revenue “up to what would be fair for consumers”, according to the financial magistrates.

“In an effective regulatory system”, the margins accumulated by energy companies “would be returned to consumers”, estimates the Court in a report published this Friday devoted to the support measures deployed by the State during the recent energy crisis.

Prices not “consistent” with production costs

But the yield from the CRI and the increase in royalties from hydroelectric concessions should “not exceed six billion euros for the years 2022 and 2023”, according to the Court.

A figure to be compared with the “more than 30 billion euros in net profit margins” (before corporate tax) recorded in 2022 and 2023 by electricity traders, producers and suppliers or with the bill of 36 billion net euros that the State must pay between 2021 and 2024 under the multiple support measures for energy consumers: price shield, fuel compensation, etc.

“Failing to capture most of the predictable profit margins to finance its support for consumers, the State seeks to limit the net budgetary cost of the shield by increasing the prices paid by the consumer,” concludes the Court of Auditors.

The “scope” and “parameterization” of this contribution “strongly limit its performance” and prevent “ensuring all French customers of electricity prices consistent with the full production costs of the park in service”, warns the control body.

Also read: Abandonment of the tariff shield, increase in taxes… Cheap electricity in France is well and truly over

This “estimates in total that the bill overall paid by end customers and taxpayers for electricity supply will thus exceed national production costs by 37 billion euros over 2022-2023”.

In its recommendations, the institution suggests to the Ministry of Ecological Transition and Bercy to “propose to Parliament to change the scope and methods of calculating the CRI for 2024, in order to increase its performance”.

The two ministries are also invited to “configure the price shield” on electricity “so that the prices paid by consumers best reflect current production costs.

» The government has so far not reacted to the criticisms of the Court of Auditors.

If the exceptional measures deployed by the State to protect households and businesses from soaring energy prices were justified, the Court recognizes, they were “abundant” and their implementation “complex”.

Risks of “windfall effects”

Shields, fuel check, wood check, electricity shock absorber: the institution lists “nearly 25 different support systems”.

Ninety percent of aid to households was “not targeted based on income or the recipients’ capacity to absorb this shock,” notes the Court.

A characteristic that is “certainly open to criticism” for public support for the consumption of gas and fossil fuels, “with regard to France’s decarbonization objectives.”

Also read Electricity: why a household's annual bill will increase by 130 euros on average

Finally, the Court of Auditors notes that the main aid measures were implemented via energy suppliers or fuel distributors, which raises questions about “the complete passing on of public support to customers”.

Faced with the risks of “windfall effects”, it invites sector authorities such as the Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) to strengthen their controls.

In September 2023, the president of the CRE Emmanuelle Wargon publicly singled out three energy suppliers (Elmy Fourniture, Mint Energy and Sagitterre), suspected of not passing on to their customers rebates granted by their supplier EDF.

Source: leparis

All business articles on 2024-03-15

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.