The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Covid-19: scientific data validates dose spacing

2021-03-02T19:25:44.538Z


Experts from the High Authority for Health can now draw on the British experience. On January 23, the High Authority for Health had proposed to postpone to six weeks, instead of four, the injection of the second dose of mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna. This postponement would have made it possible, according to his estimates, to vaccinate 700,000 additional people in February, thus protecting them from the risk of developing a serious form of Covid-19 at a time when an upsurge


On January 23, the High Authority for Health had proposed to postpone to six weeks, instead of four, the injection of the second dose of mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna.

This postponement would have made it possible, according to his estimates, to vaccinate 700,000 additional people in February, thus protecting them from the risk of developing a serious form of Covid-19 at a time when an upsurge of the virus threatened.

But the Ministry of Health, prioritizing

"the security of validated data"

, had not followed up.

The HAS returns to the charge in a notice published on Tuesday.

With new studies in her pocket, she once again recommends, concerning mRNA vaccines,

"to vaccinate as many people as possible as early as March by postponing the administration of the second dose of vaccine six weeks after the first without going to the hospital. beyond ”

.

This spacing of doses up to 42 days is authorized by the European Medicines Agency, as well as by the French National Medicines Safety Agency (ANSM).

In

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 68% left to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All tech articles on 2021-03-02

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.