Two male students from Ma'anshan No. 1 Middle School had a high-performance explosive TATP hidden in the school in November of the previous year. One of the boys argued that he brought TATP back to school to ask his teacher for advice, and he possessed TATP for experimental and self-study purposes.
When the judge made a ruling in the District Court today (14), he did not accept his claim that he wanted to do an experiment. He also said that he neither stated what kind of experiment he wanted to do nor asked the teacher for advice. He ruled him on three counts of possession of explosives. As for the other male student in the same case, he was found not guilty of the crime and he was given court fees due to insufficient evidence.
The convicted defendant was remanded in custody, and the case was postponed until September 28 in order to obtain reports from the defendant’s training center, reeducation through labor, and rehabilitation center.
One person's sin becomes one person's sin
The two defendants, Li Wenguang (20 years old) and Zhao Xu (18 years old), were both charged with one count of possession of explosives. Li Wenguang was also charged with one count of possession of explosives and one count of possession of ammunition without a license.
Li was found guilty of all charges, but Zhao Ze was not guilty.
Li Xiang’s chemistry teacher said there are fun chemicals
According to the control plan, at 8 o'clock in the morning on November 27, 2019, Li walked to the chemistry teacher Zhang Shanen and told Zhang to bring some "something fun" chemicals back to school.
Zhang was worried that the chemicals were dangerous, so he and his social workers went to the class room to look for Li at noon.
According to Zhang's request, Li gave the chemicals wrapped in tin paper to Zhang and told him that the chemicals were TATP.
The first defendant, Li Wenguang, claimed that he had experimented at home before bringing the explosive TATP back to school and found that it was not as dangerous as the information indicated.
(New photo by Zhu Di)
The rally found that Zhao Yi had similar items
When Zhang later assembled in the auditorium, he saw Zhao holding a paper bag in his hand, which was very similar to Li's paper bag.
After being questioned by the dean of training, Zhao claimed that it was a plaything, and then said, "Add water to it and let it freeze to make you happy." The school finally called the police to deal with it.
Li called possession of TATP as experiment and self-study
In his own defense, Li claimed that the TATP powder was given to him by a man in black. He brought the powder back to school to ask the teacher for advice, and tried to detonate with Zhao. The empty shells are only for decorative purposes.
Zhao pointed out that the other defendant stuffed him with powder
Zhao claimed that Li Ai boasted and boasted that the paper bag involved in the case was forcibly stuffed into him by Li. Although the first defendant had said that the powder could explode when burned, he did not believe it.
Li has already checked the dangers of TATP online
The judge pointedly pointed out that he did not believe in Li’s statement, and analyzed that when Li gave a testimony, he did not specifically mention what experiment he wanted to perform. He only said that he wanted to burn TATP powder and test the explosion effect. He believed that the statement was basically the same as the mentality of lighting firecrackers and fireworks. It's just "playful" instead of experimenting.
Furthermore, Li has already checked TATP's information on the Internet and learned that it is a high-performance and sensitive explosive, but he still ignores the risk of injury and damage to property.
Did not ask the teacher from beginning to end
Regarding Li's claim that he brought TATP powder back to school in order to consult a chemistry teacher, the judge said that he never consulted the teacher from beginning to end.
In fact, relevant information can be searched on the Internet, and he could not expect the teacher to burn TATP in the laboratory.
In addition, because Li only put the empty packs in his wallet, not in the form of decorations, he was not satisfied with his excuse and was convicted of possession of explosives and unlicensed ammunition.
CCTV filmed Zhao wanted to return the powder to Li
As for Zhao’s case, the judge said that the closed-circuit footage showed that he tried to return the paper bag to Li many times, but was unsuccessful. He also believed that Zhao had reason to believe that the paper bag contained non-explosive materials, so he was ruled not guilty and he was also sued. fee.
Case Number: DCCC343/2020
Two middle school students said to the teacher that there were fun chemicals involved in explosives The activity can constitute human life and death, and the prisoner has four years of death. The Dajiaozui unit is suspected to be used to develop black powder and use drones to throw the male tenant to recognize the possession of explosives. The Tai Kok Tsui unit hides explosives
01News
