The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Covid-19: a laboratory accused of improperly conducting tests on the Pfizer vaccine

2021-11-03T18:19:29.500Z


The Ventavia group, commissioned by Pfizer to assess the effectiveness of its vaccine, "falsified data" and "delayed monitoring side effects," according to an article in the British Medical Journal.


A subcontractor of the pharmaceutical group Pfizer, responsible for carrying out a small part of the clinical trials of its anti-Covid 19 vaccine, made numerous mistakes during these tests, according to an article in the

British Medical Journal

which quotes a former employee.

The Texan group Ventavia, specializing in conducting clinical trials and commissioned last year by Pfizer to assess the effectiveness of its anti-Covid vaccine, notably "

falsified data

" and "

delayed in monitoring side effects

”, according to this article published Tuesday, November 3.

To discover

  • Covid-19: what we know about the Delta variant

  • Covid-19: the third vaccine dose, instructions for use

Read alsoCovid-19: Pfizer recommended for vaccine booster

Ventavia played only a small role in the trials of this vaccine, developed by Pfizer with the German BioNTech.

The Texan group has conducted tests on a thousand people, while the vaccine has, in total, been evaluated on about 44,000 people around the world.

These trials, demonstrating particularly high efficacy, have led to the authorization of the vaccine in many countries, such as the United States and the countries of the European Union.

Numerous breaches

The primary source for the BMJ article is former Ventavia employee Brook Jackson, who worked there for two weeks during the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine trials, before being fired.

Brook Jackson says he has witnessed many breaches.

Among the latter, she accuses Ventavia in particular of having, through its inconsistencies in labeling, compromised the double-blind allocation of the vaccine.

Read alsoThe Marseille prosecutor's office assesses the ANSM report on a "wild experiment" at the IHU, led by Didier Raoult

This procedure is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of a treatment compared to a placebo. She makes sure that neither patients nor caregivers know whether it is one or the other. Brook Jackson cites other shortcomings, such as the fact that the vaccines were not stored at the right temperature, and says she informed the US health authorities, the FDA, which she said took note of her report. but did not follow up.

Contacted by AFP, the FDA refrained from commenting on this file but assured “

its full confidence in the data which led to support the authorization of the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine

”.

According to another source cited by the BMJ, this anonymous, Pfizer dispatched an audit of Ventavia, once informed of "

problems

" in the conduct of the tests.

Neither Pfizer nor Ventavia responded immediately to AFP's requests.

Source: lefigaro

All tech articles on 2021-11-03

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.