The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

A member of the ultra-left contests the legality of his wiretapping before the Council of State

2024-03-12T17:53:29.689Z

Highlights: Man was convicted in December for a violent action plan linked to the ultra-left. He contests the legality of his wiretapping before the Council of State. Microphones had been installed in his truck. “The fact of having joined the YPG, which is not considered a terrorist group by France, is not enough,” said Raphaël Kempf, the man's lawyer. The hearing was held behind closed doors, in front of a specialized body authorized to maintain defense secrecy.


The man was convicted in December for a violent action plan linked to the ultra-left. He contests the legality of his wiretapping,


Microphones had been installed in his truck.

An ultra-left sympathizer, convicted in December for a planned violent action, challenged Tuesday before the Council of State the legality of his wiretapping by the intelligence services which led to his arrest, we learned from a source close to the case and from his lawyers.

According to Florian D.'s defense, the microphones were installed in the vehicle in which the latter resided upon his return from Rojava (north-eastern Syria), where he had fought in 2017 with the Kurds of the People's Protection Units (YPG) against the jihadist group Islamic State (IS).

However, maintain his lawyers Messrs Isabelle Zribi and Raphaël Kempf, such surveillance can, according to the law, only take place in the event of “suspicion of terrorist activity”.

“The fact of having joined the YPG, which is not considered a terrorist group by France, is not enough,” said Raphaël Kempf.

“A black hole in the rule of law”

The hearing before the Council of State on Tuesday morning, revealed by L'Obs, was held behind closed doors, in front of a specialized body authorized to maintain defense secrecy.

The lawyer and the litigant must come out when the elements classified as defense secrets, the very ones they contest, are discussed.

“An archaic procedure which shames the Republic”, denounces Me Raphaël Kempf.

“It is a black hole in the rule of law which takes us back to the Inquisition: judges have access to elements that they do not share with the litigant”, deprived of being able to discuss the case in a “contradictory” manner .

Intelligence from the DGSI (General Directorate of Internal Security) was at the origin of the opening in 2020 of an investigation by the national anti-terrorism prosecutor's office, which suspected Florian D. and other ultra-left sympathizers of preparing a planned violent action against police officers or soldiers.

These seven activists, who disputed the facts during their trial in October, were convicted of terrorist conspiracy.

Florian D., considered a “central figure” of the group by the court, was sentenced to the heaviest sentence – five years in prison, half of which was suspended.

He appealed.

Source: leparis

All tech articles on 2024-03-12

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.