The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Hearing impaired students involved in the police case officer ordered the prosecution to hand over police officer information

2020-05-13T06:54:18.484Z


Hearing impaired students were involved in the police when they participated in the tour operation on September 15 last year. The case was re-appeared in the Eastern District Court today (13th). The prosecution requested that the police officer involved be anonymized. After being kicked off, even more police officers appeared in the courtroom to testify about family information within an hour. The defense alleges that the bottoming incident mentioned by the party occurred before the high court ban. When the defendant was arrested, a police officer waved a baton in front of the defendant, which surprised the defendant. Refuse. The magistrate finally ordered the prosecution to hand over the relevant information to the defense within four weeks. As for the police officer ’s anonymous application, he was postponed until June 19.


Social News

Written by: Lu Leqian

2020-05-13 14:46

Date of last update: 2020-05-13 14:46

Hearing impaired students were involved in the police when they participated in the tour operation on September 15 last year. The case was re-appeared in the Eastern District Court today (13th). The prosecution requested that the police officer involved be anonymized. After being kicked off, even more police officers appeared in the courtroom to testify about family information within an hour. The defense alleges that the bottoming incident mentioned by the party occurred before the high court ban. When the defendant was arrested, a police officer waved a baton in front of the defendant, which surprised the defendant. Refuse. The magistrate finally ordered the prosecution to hand over the relevant information to the defense within four weeks. As for the police officer ’s anonymous application, he was postponed until June 19.

The defendant Luo Zhenjie left under the umbrella. (Photo by Lu Leqian)

The defendant Luo Zhenjie, 20 years old, with hearing impairment, reported that the student was charged with one count of assaulting a police officer, that he attacked the police officer X who was performing his duties outside the exit C of Causeway Bay MTR station on the same day.

Refers to a police officer who used a baton in front of the defendant

The defense lawyer revealed in court that according to CCTV footage, the defendant was surrounded by a team of police officers including the police officer X involved, and some police officers waved batons up and down in front of the defendant. The defense has repeatedly asked the police for the identity and record book of the police officers of the team. The police said that they could not determine who the police officers were, and asked the defense to explain why the information was needed, so the defense made another application in court. .

The prosecution stated that the situation was chaotic

The prosecutor rebutted that the situation was chaotic on the day, and there were many police officers. The footage alone may not be able to confirm who these police officers are. Magistrate Lin Ziqin once suggested that the defense should ask for the team involved in X. The defense stated that it was not possible to confirm that all the police officers involved belonged to the first team in the Xiumaoping Heavy Case Group. Lin Guan finally required the prosecution to hand over the relevant information within 4 weeks.

The prosecution claimed that a police officer was taken off after testifying

In addition, the prosecution also applied again for anonymizing the identity of the police officer X involved. It also pointed out that the Internet's groundwork for police officers is prevailing. Even if the high court has issued an injunction, the situation cannot be controlled. It also refers to the fact that a police officer earlier appeared in court less than an hour after the netizens uploaded their personal and family privacy online.

The defense stated that the incident occurred before the high court ban

The defense accused the party of saying too general, and there was no evidence to prove that X was frightened, and it failed to show how many online bottoms were directed against the police officers who gave testimony. One thing happened before the injunction issued by the High Court. In fact, since the high court issued the injunction, the bottom-up incidents have been significantly reduced. The defense believes that the court should consider the public's right to know and should not restrict freedom of editing.

Officer Lin also said that someone on the Internet alone had ordered some police officers to hide the name of the person involved in the case. The approach was not commensurate, so the case was adjourned until June 19 when it was called again to make a decision ; The defendant may continue to bail out under the original conditions.

Case number: ESCC 291/2020

Fugitive Offenders | Siteworker involved in causing police sergeant to fall and charged with assault

Fugitive Offenders Ordinance | Government female clerks recognize police officers when MTR sluice gates say probation is not suitable for 14 days in prison

Fugitive Offenders | "Yue Juvenile" confessed to the streets of North Point with a telescopic stick attacking the police

Assault Court Related to Hearing Police Fugitive Offenders Ordinance

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-05-13

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-30T22:15:40.255Z
News/Politics 2024-03-14T05:24:05.011Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.