The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Opinion | An obituary for a rotation that did not occur Israel today

2021-11-22T21:28:09.554Z


Yes, there was one such moment, of unity, where everyone gives up on everyone, just-not-bibi people to their opponents and vice versa • The problem is that not everyone gave up: the tone of resistance on the street and on the net remained exactly as it was, and even sharpened


So today that should have been a fact, yes?

On 17.11.21, Bnei Gantz had to replace Netanyahu as prime minister, so today he already had to be prime minister. .

The truth is, it was a script that people like me prayed for.

It was the only time in the entire morbid political course of events of 2021-2019 that an alliance was indeed forged between two hawkish sides, each of which gave up much to bring about governmental peace and unity: Ganz, retiring his partners in blue and white and joining Netanyahu, relinquishing the sacred Rak-La-Bibi , And Netanyahu resigned as prime minister in the second half of his term.

Even more than the two personalities, their voters gave up: these had to accept Bibi, against whom they roared in a hoarse throat until two minutes ago, and these had to see how a small party leader, a political novice who was crowned by his comrades as a result of constellation - entered the alternate Prime Minister's office. "M.

Yes.

There was one moment like that, and it was that moment.

A moment of unity where everyone gives up on everyone.

The problem is that not everyone has given up.

The tone of resistance on the street and on the net remained exactly as it was and even sharpened, and the groom Netanyahu discovered in the morning that he had received the wrong bride, and even more so - that this wrong bride remained at home with her parents and did not come with them to their common home.

The dissolution of the government was absolutely necessary, because it was impossible to function when half of the ministers cooperated with demonstrations condemning the government and calling for its dissolution, and the riots on the street continued in full force.

One can argue about the question of whether the way to overthrow the government should have gone through the non-transfer of the budget or not, but as for the very issue of canceling the agreement, for me there is no question: that government has not fallen.

She just never got up.

And that's it.

There were no more such moments of true willingness to give up.

After the fall of the government, there were more options on the horizon: the Netanyahu-Lapid government could have been formed, which would have really broken the tie and madness, and would have brought a real line of unity - but one has never even been talked about by Yesh Atid (M.S.L.).

The maximum we have reached is a minority government of one side maintained in the arteries that give it a narrow majority, and a frustrated and damaged majority that fortunately the government is not the kind that travels to demonstrate in Balfour.

And one more small matter, Shuli, which should also be mentioned: there was one right-wing (?) Party that did not then enter that unity coalition of Netanyahu and Gantz, and it is the right of Bennett and Shaked.

Why?

Depends on who you ask.

Netanyahu insists that Bennett never intended to enter the coalition under him, Bennett and Shaked insist that they received humiliating offers and that Netanyahu wanted them out.

I have long believed that this move by Netanyahu is the one that pushed the right into the arms of the opposite side.

Today I believe this is true of some of my right-wing members.

Naftali Bennett, on the other hand, already knew then that he was going to be prime minister and that Nitzan Horowitz was going to be a member of his security cabinet.

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2021-11-22

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.