The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Cycling: in the opposite direction, a Belgian rider finds himself alone facing the peloton in full sprint

2022-04-06T18:14:47.056Z


Tim Merlier, the Belgian rider from the Alpecin-Fenix ​​team, went the wrong way after arriving at the Grand-Prix de l'Escaut and missed


It's a rare scene at this level.

After the arrival of the Grand Prix de l'Escaut, an old Flandrian classic nicknamed today "Unofficial World Championship for sprinters" because the latter win it almost every time, we just thought we were celebrating the victory of the Norwegian Alexander Kristoff (Wanty).

But, and despite himself, it was another sprinter who stood out: Tim Merlier (Alpecin-Fenix).

The latter, winner of the third stage of the Tour de France 2021 in Pontivy, clearly had his head elsewhere when he crossed the finish line.

Instead of continuing his effort after the race to join his team bus still at the end of the line, Merlier turned around and started in the opposite direction.

He hadn't realized that the race wasn't over for everyone...

After a few tens of meters, he saw in front of him a dozen retarded sprinting for a place of honor.

And in the last kilometer, barriers are installed on both sides of the road to block spectators.

But how did Tim Merlier end up in this situation?!

😅#lequipeVELO pic.twitter.com/TuqA5vMKcg

— the chain L'Équipe (@lachainelequipe) April 6, 2022

For a few moments, we thought we were witnessing the most improbable collision in modern cycling.

But Merlier then realized his blunder and had just enough time to get off the bike and hoist himself up, a bit ridiculously, on the other side of the barriers.

And it is perched between two barriers that he observed the sprint of those he almost hit by his recklessness.

Source: leparis

All sports articles on 2022-04-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.