The policeman, who reported to the reality star and abducted a spate of curses from her, wrote a defense after suing him • "Pressure lever against a police officer who did his job faithfully"

Lihi Griner was caught driving a phone by hand // from Instagram

The legal saga between police officer defamed by Lahia Griner on social media when she wrote a report on cellphone use while refusing to die: In a defense statement filed by a police officer, Griner claims he is "Noel's attempt to disqualify him" And to add sin to crime. "

Recall that, after suing Greiner for the charges she posted against him, Greiner filed a lawsuit against her accusing the officer of revealing her residence and allegedly violating her privacy. In the defense, the cop's attorneys reject the allegations, stating that "the plaintiff's residence is available to all claimants, and even the plaintiff has worked vigorously, on numerous occasions, to publish her residential address anywhere on the network, including pictures of her apartment, the building where she resides, and the neighborhood where she resides. They are found. "

Another topic:

• Watch: Lehia Griner curses a cop

• Lehia Griner: "I'm tactless only for people who are retarded"

In defense, Kobi Shalom, through his attorneys Dr. Yechiel Weinroth and Uri Ben-Yohnah, wrote that Greener was an "Israeli celebrity" who became famous for participating in various "reality" programs, and who bought herself a name and a stage, mainly because of various provocations. , And blatantly and extroverted communication. "

Troopers also state that Greiner operates a commercial business under the nickname "Lehigh Lite," in which she conducts personal meetings, lectures, and nutrition workshops for all clients. They present to the court a host of publications and articles, which they say can be impressed that not only is Griner anxious for her privacy but vice versa, she repeatedly exposes her home, neighborhood, address and building where she lives.

The attorneys even quote Greiner's remarks in an interview with the Pipeline Program that if the policeman did not sue her she would not sue him back, things from which it can be learned that "the whole purpose of the prosecution is to attempt to apply an improper counterpressure lever to the cop who just did his job faithfully" . Griner also claims that the officer broke into a police database to remove her "unfounded" address.

According to them, the police officer was the one who wrote the report to Greiner, with his residence address as used in every report. Regarding Greiner's allegations that she did not disclose the cop's details, Attorney Weinroth and her son Yohnna accuse Greiner of presenting a partial and partial picture to the court, as she refrained from presenting him her own publications in which the photo of the fine, which contained the policeman's full name, appeared.

Finally, the police officer asks the court to dismiss the counterclaim and impose on Greiner's expenses because, in their words, it is a "noxious and wrongful attempt by the counterclaimer to slack off the defendant's hands and add a sin to crime, after the counterclaim has already libeled and whitened his face to many, receive with a commission. In doing so for no wrongdoing. "