Social News
Author: Lao Minyi
2020-06-14 10:24
Last update date: 2020-06-14 10:25The Education Bureau revises the teacher training requirements, in which new recruits and promoted teachers are required to receive training organized by the Bureau from the 2020/21 school year, including national and international education development, teacher professional ethics, etc., the National Anthem Law and the National Security The Law also attracted public attention. Associate Vice President of Lingnan University Liu Zhipeng said this morning (14th) that it is natural to raise the national flag and play the national anthem in schools and public institutions in Hong Kong.
Ye Weiyi, the dean of the Chinese Culture Research Institute on the same field, believes that students may respond to political considerations. Teachers should maintain professional ethics and bottom line. In addition to tolerance and teaching, students should be stopped if they break the law.
Liu Zhipeng believes that the controversy caused by the test questions is due to the imbalance of the information provided by the test question design, which makes it difficult for candidates to answer. (Profile picture / Photo by Huang Baoying)
The national anthem law should have appeared when it returned in 1997
Liu Zhipeng said on the commercial program "Political Good Sunday" that the national anthem law should have appeared when he returned in 1997, and recognized the concept of "one country". He believed that raising the national flag and playing the national anthem in schools or public institutions is a natural thing, but only in It has been uncomfortable to appear more than 20 years after the return. He believes that teachers in Hong Kong may not fully understand modern China, and laughter brings students and teachers back to the Mainland for inspection, or a public toilet experience has completely destroyed the perception, but if they are allowed to contact their peers in the Mainland to understand their views on the future, it may help deepen know each other.
Ye Weiyi, the dean of the Chinese Culture Research Institute on the same field, said that he understands that students may have different views on the national anthem law, and some people have different reactions due to political considerations. They believe that the education industry must tolerate and accept that students will do wrong things, and they must slowly teach and provide opportunities for correction At the same time, there should be professional ethics and bottom line, if the students break the law, it should be stopped. He also pointed out that professional training is required whenever necessary. He thinks that many people are worried about being brainwashed, and asks, "Is it easy to brainwash the teacher?"
National Anthem Law | Police Guidance News: Will Check Social Media Remarks Restaurant Private Party Also Managed
The National Anthem Law public hearing rushed to the official Zheng Jialang and three others fined 1,000 officials to call for a useful body
National Anthem Law｜Students insult the national anthem if it hinders the operation of the school and destroys the relationship between students Yang Runxiong: Call the police
All members of the public involved in the national anthem law public hearing conflict security said that the boss was a little named to pay attention to Zheng Jialang
Liu Zhipeng: Provoking controversial test questions distorts history
There are test questions in the History Department of the Middle School Diploma Test (DSE) that require candidates to comment on whether they agree that "the advantages and disadvantages Japan brings to China in 1900-45 years" caused controversy. In the end, the HKEAA decided to cancel the test questions. Liu Zhipeng believes that the controversy of the test questions stems from the imbalance of the information provided by the test question design, which makes it difficult for candidates to answer; if the test questions must provide arguments for both pros and cons, bluntly distorting history. When asked whether the Education Bureau's request to cancel the test questions interfered with the HKEAA, Liu Zhipeng expressed disagreement, believing that the approach was appropriate, and also made it clear that the HKEAA's policies needed to be adjusted, and that university admissions should be diversified to reduce the pressure on candidates.
Ye Weiyi said that the controversial test was uncomfortable and unacceptable, and explained that the history department should not only teach students historical knowledge, but also a kind of value education, which should inculcate correct values.
National Anthem Law Chinese History DSE 2020