The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The chancellery validates the possibility of judging from a distance, even at the Assises

2020-11-21T22:10:04.419Z


An order allowing videoconference hearings, including for a life sentence, worries lawyers.Are the Chancellery and its very popular tenant, Keeper of the Seals Éric Dupond-Moretti, tripping over the carpet of civil liberties? In 48 hours, the publication of the order allowing unrestricted use of videoconferencing, including the Assizes, set fire to the powder among lawyers. This order, signed Wednesday, makes it possible to generalize videoconferencing to all criminal proceedings, corr


Are the Chancellery and its very popular tenant, Keeper of the Seals Éric Dupond-Moretti, tripping over the carpet of civil liberties?

In 48 hours, the publication of the order allowing unrestricted use of videoconferencing, including the Assizes, set fire to the powder among lawyers.

This order, signed Wednesday, makes it possible to generalize videoconferencing to all criminal proceedings, correctional and criminal hearings, before the judge of liberty and detention, and that of the investigation, "without agreement of the litigants", s' insults the National Bar Council (CNB), and to resort to the single judge at discretion when the procedure provides for a collegial hearing, including in matters of juvenile justice.

Ensuring the continuity of justice

In addition, insists the CNB, this order

"gives the possibility to all jurisdictions to restrict advertising at the discretion of the President, the JLD or the investigating chamber"

.

"It's a blow

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 71% left to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

Enter your email

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2020-11-21

Similar news:

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.