The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Corona lockdown: Streeck complains about the Merkel summit - expert agreements in the back room?

2021-01-30T21:22:39.012Z


Hendrik Streeck was not an expert when the corona lockdown was extended. He suggests that politicians may get one-sided information.


Hendrik Streeck was not an expert when the corona lockdown was extended.

He suggests that politicians may get one-sided information.

  • It is still unclear how the rules for the corona lockdown will continue from February 15.

  • The virologist

    Hendrik Streeck

    criticizes how the lockdown decisions came about

    (see first report).

    FDP leader Christian Lindner

    wants to work to ensure that the schools are reopened as quickly as possible

    (see update from January 30, 4:27 p.m.).

  • Federal Interior Minister

    Horst Seehofer (CSU),

    on the other hand, is warning of a third wave if it is loosened too quickly (see update from January 30th, 9:30 p.m.).

Update from January 30th, 9:30 pm

: “At the moment, nobody can seriously assess how things will continue in mid-February,” said Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer in an interview with the

Augsburger Allgemeine.

He was not exactly optimistic about possible easing.

For him, however, one thing is certain: “One thing can be said after all experience in

combating infection

: Even after a

lockdown, you will

not be able to return to normal conditions immediately and completely.

That will only be possible in stages. "

In the same breath he even warned against loosening too early - with a drastic prognosis: "Otherwise there is a risk of a relapse into the third wave," he said.

Lockdown in Germany: FDP boss calls for schools and daycare centers to be opened up faster

Update from January 30, 2021, 4:27 p.m

.: "The families are done with their nerves.

New slogans to persevere here are of no use, ”said FDP leader Christian Lindner on Saturday.

He calls for schools and daycare centers to be opened up more quickly - especially because many children run the risk of

losing touch

with the

education system

.

He fears massive damage to children and adolescents - another eight weeks could not be held.

Looking at the upcoming

Lockdown discussions

between

federal

and

countries

besides, he said, "fundamental rights that we are guaranteed by our Constitution, are reinterpreted in the political debate to special rights and privileges." Once again he spoke involvement of

Parliament

in decisions about the continuation of the

measures

.

The

FDP

should

focus on

the modernization of the state and society as well as family law.

For a rapid recovery of the

economy

without structural breaks, he wants to

rely,

among other things, on consistent

test strategies

and open

limits

.

Corona lockdown: more backroom consultation than scientific discussion?

First report from January 30th, 3:50 p.m.

- What

happens

after February 14th?

Will the

corona lockdown

in Germany continue as before - or will the measures be relaxed?

The experts do not agree, but the well-known virologist Hendrick Streeck makes it clear: This is not a problem, but

normal

in

science

.

This also gives rise to his assessment of the previous lockdown and political decision-making.

In an

interview

with

Welt

, Streeck explains: "To pretend there is a universal truth and one who guards it is unscientific." But that is exactly what happened not only in public debate.

The federal government may not have made sufficient efforts to hear different perspectives from professional circles.

What the

virologist

reports is also an attack on the way in

which the lockdown was negotiated

in

Germany

.

In an interview, Streeck looks back on the spring of 2020, when he was one of the first to

research

the novel

coronavirus

in Germany

.

He had clear expectations of politics: “I thought: there will be concerted action.

I would never have thought that there would be so many backroom agreements that a scientific interest in researching something could become so politicized. ”This view should change in the course of the year.

Streeck was one of the

experts

who

rated

the risk from

Covid-19

slightly lower than some professional colleagues.

An opinion that was

not always popular

in

politics

, says Streeck and gives examples.

No dissenting opinions desired at Merkel's lockdown summit?

Before the last extension of the lockdown in Germany, the Chancellery invited scientific experts.

Two

prime ministers

would also have liked to have Streeck or the epidemiologist

Klaus Stöhr

with them.

In the end, none of them were invited to submit an alternative review.

“Two

scientists

who hold a different point of view were proposed by the Prime Minister - and yet ignored.

If I were Prime Minister, I would like to hear the broadest possible scientific picture and also arguments for and against, ”he explains.

As early as December, Streeck complained in an interview with

Münchner Merkur

that not all the necessary debates were held in public.

Check out this post on Instagram

$ {caption}

$ {footer} $ {time}

Streeck sees no option in permanent lockdown

For Streeck, extending the lockdown further and further cannot be the solution.

If only because the

vaccinations will

ease the situation.

However, the corona

pandemic

will not be overcome in the sense that the

new infections will

actually be brought to zero.

Of course,

low

case numbers

or no infections are desirable.

But so far there is no answer as to how this should be maintained in the long term.

Except for Germany, it is sealed off permanently. ”This option is by no means in the virologist's opinion.

He is optimistic for the coming summer and also for the long-term development.

"Because I don't want to imagine anything else."

(Rm)

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2021-01-30

Similar news:

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.