The collection of evidence in the 4000 case continues:
At the beginning of the hearing that took place today (Wednesday), Adv. The media.
Advocate Tirosh added: "It is not written in the indictment that defendant 1 fired the witness because of the complaints, it is written that at the time he fired him he knew about complaints." Yesterday, Berger was asked what he knew about Netanyahu's involvement The media at the time, Adv. Eitan Tzafrir.
Shaul Alovich in court, archive, photo: Oren Ben Hakon
Advocate Hozak, representing Elovich, questioned him and confronted him with Tzafrir's version. Berger replied that "it was made clear to me that Tzafrir is the link between the prime minister.
I received instructions and doubted Tzafrir's requests, I exercised critical thinking. "
Discussions in the 4000 case in the Netanyahu trial resumed about a week ago, and the first testimony was given by the regulation, after the former director general of the Ministry of Communications, Avi Berger, appeared on the witness stand. Now, Berger's testimony is supposed to show how the Ministry of Communications facilitated Elovich in the alleged deal between him and former Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Berger explained in his testimony about the reform that was supposed to be in the communications market, where companies competing with Bezeq would be able to ride on its infrastructure in order to reduce prices.
The damage that will be caused to Bezeq as a result, he says, is approaching one billion shekels, and at least several hundred million shekels.