The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"It was appropriate to act differently": The Commissioner harshly criticized the State Attorney's Office in the Efi Naveh case and the judge | Israel today

2021-12-26T20:14:45.481Z


Retired Judge David Rosen accepted Naveh's complaint regarding the conduct of former State Attorney Shai Nitzan and law enforcement • Naveh alleged flaws in the investigation process, including an early search of illegal materials • Rosen: "It was right to present things in detail and clearly."


The Attorney General's Audit Commissioner, retired Judge David Rosen, received today (Sunday) the complaint of Adv. Efi Naveh, filed through his attorney Adv. Boaz Ben Tzur, regarding the conduct of former State Attorney Shai Nitzan and the law enforcement authorities, as part of the 1454 case investigation Judge Rosen found the complaint to be justified, while sharply criticizing the conduct of law enforcement.

Adv. Naveh claimed defects in the investigation. Among other things, Adv. Naveh claimed in his complaint that the law enforcement officers presented a misleading presentation to the Magistrate's Court, as part of an attempt to "whitewash" materials obtained while committing criminal offenses from his cell phones.

In this regard, Commissioner Rosen stated that "it was appropriate to specify in the application to the court explicitly that the material, for which the order is sought, was allegedly obtained while illegally hacking into mobile phones ... the conclusion that it was correct to present things in detail and clearly could not be avoided." .



Effi Naveh is released from house arrest, archive

Commissioner Rosen further stated that "it would not be right to evaluate and anticipate the decision made by the court, had the things that were clearly known to the then State Attorney, as well as to investigators, according to which the material was produced by Steif illegally, been presented to him in an orderly and explicit manner. By the state in the written application. "

In these circumstances, Commissioner Rosen ruled that Adv. Naveh's complaint regarding the lack of full disclosure of the circumstances of the request for the court order was justified.

It was further alleged in the complaint that the investigators carried out an illegal early search of the materials, when contents from Naveh's correspondence were read to them.

According to the decision: "Since Steiff allegedly illegally infiltrated the cell phones through someone on her behalf, the information produced by her was obtained, in all likelihood, in an offense. To behave differently. "  

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2021-12-26

Similar news:

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.