The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Trump vs. US Department of Justice: Supreme Court dismisses Trump's summary motion

2022-10-13T20:41:25.600Z


In the dispute over the documents confiscated during an FBI raid, the Supreme Court made it clear: Donald Trump's special auditor will not have access to the documents classified as secret.


Enlarge image

A flag in front of the US Supreme Court in Washington

Photo: MANDEL NGAN / AFP

Former US President Donald Trump has suffered a defeat in a legal dispute over the evaluation of confiscated secret documents.

The country's Supreme Court on Thursday rejected an emergency appeal by the ex-president.

Trump's lawyers asked the Supreme Court last week that a special auditor must have access to the classified documents.

The court gave no explanation as to why it denied the application.

In early August, the Federal Police FBI searched Trump's villa in the US state of Florida.

The FBI confiscated various classified documents, some with the highest level of secrecy.

Among the thousands of documents, according to the FBI, were around 100 documents marked as secret.

By keeping the documents in his private home after leaving office, Trump could have made himself liable to prosecution.

The result was legal wrangling by the authorities.

Trump's team was finally able to achieve success with the appointment of a neutral examiner.

However, an appeals court denied the special auditor access to the documents marked as secret.

Trump's lawyers argued in the Supreme Court that the 76-year-old had unlimited power to declassify documents while he was president.

Therefore, markings alone cannot determine whether a document is still classified or whether Trump has released it.

Therefore, the special investigator must be given access to intervene in cases of doubt.

The Supreme Court has now rejected it.

sak/dpa

Source: spiegel

All news articles on 2022-10-13

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.