The right-wing majority Senate tried on Wednesday, as part of the examination of the draft budget for 2023, to provide a response to the tension in the housing market in tourist areas, without convincing the government.
The debate on this sensitive subject took place while many mayors are received this week in the Senate, within the framework of their Congress.
"This subject is only the result of a reform (abolition of the housing tax on the main residence, editor's note) unfunded, sloppy, and which the communities must today, as they can treat it"
, has immediately affirmed the general rapporteur of the budget Jean-François Husson (LR).
“The French may have saved money”
with this deletion,
“but the French can no longer find housing”
, added the centrist Annick Billon.
Read alsoBudget: Senate green light for very limited use of frying oil as fuel
For the ecologist Ronan Dantec,
"that we can no longer live at home in our territory (...) is causing a deep rupture in the country"
.
The government has introduced into the finance bill considered adopted at first reading by the National Assembly an article allowing the extension of
"zoning"
, where municipalities are authorized to increase the housing tax of residences by 60%. secondary.
Read alsoBudget 2023: the Senate rejects by show of hands the article abolishing the CVAE
The objective is to provide additional leverage to municipalities where local populations are struggling to find year-round accommodation, while accommodation exists but is rarely occupied.
The Minister in charge of Public Accounts Gabriel Attal indicated that
“according to the figures from Bercy, 80% of the municipalities”
which are entitled to this increase do not use this possibility.
“Decorrelate”
housing tax rates on second homes
Proposals have been made in the hemicycle to go further by making it possible to
"decorrelate"
the rates of housing tax on second homes (THRS) and property taxes, so that the increase in the first does not penalize not mechanically the permanent habitat.
But senators have warned against a risk of “bludgeoning” second homes.
"This rule of link, certainly restrictive, makes it possible to avoid that a community makes weigh the load of the tax on a particular category of taxpayers"
, underlined François Husson.
"What we are asking is to allow communities to decide what is good for them in tax matters,"
pleaded the boss of PS senators, Patrick Kanner.
After long debates, the Senate finally voted, against the opinion of the government, an amendment of
"compromise"
proposed by Philippe Bas (LR) to give the communities a margin of maneuver, but limited.
According to this amendment,
"it would be possible to increase the tax on secondary residences within the limit of 25% without increasing the tax on built land"
,