The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The "Fig Mag" Letter of June 24, 2023

2023-06-24T07:16:46.672Z

Highlights: In exclusivity, an interview with Bernard Arnault, and his portrait by Jean-Marie Rouart. How the Groupama-FDJ team is preparing for the Tour de France; our summer cultural agenda; a trip to Finnish Lapland. By Jean-Christophe Buisson, Editor-in-Chief, La Gazzetta dello Sport. For many years, the chairman and CEO of LVMH has become the ideal scapegoat for the far left, which swears by...


EXCLUSIVE SUBSCRIBER LETTER - In exclusivity, an interview with Bernard Arnault, and his portrait by Jean-Marie Rouart; how the Groupama-FDJ team is preparing for the Tour de France; our summer cultural agenda; a trip to Finnish Lapland.


By Jean-Christophe Buisson

Dear subscribers,

Bernard Arnault is not discreet, he is secretive. At his own risk: by speaking little, he lets say a lot. On him, his family, his ambitions, his fortune, his character. Some, who have never met him, describe him as a cold monster with a chilling look. Others argue that such a rich man can only have faults, that his money is necessarily taken from others, that he does not redistribute it enough, that 9/10th of it should be taken away from him to give it to the poor. Since 1789, the song has been known: anyone who rises above the fray, even by merit or work, is guilty. Its success is never denied? "It's unfair!" say the duds. His head sticks out? "Let it be shortened!" shout the mediocre. For many years, the chairman and CEO of LVMH has become the ideal scapegoat for the far left, which swears by ...

This article is for subscribers only. You still have 89% to discover.

Flash Sale -70%

Offer available until June 29. Without obligation.

I TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT

Already a subscriber? Log

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2023-06-24

Similar news:

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.