Status: 10.11.2023, 17:01 PM
By: Andrea Gräpel
CommentsShare
The nest box wall was a condition for the conversion of the area of the former Ruppaner-Hof and was financed by Euroboden. In the meantime, the property has a new owner – and he wants to settle there, which the community does not want. © A. Jaksch
Just not a fast-food chain and just not a logistics company - both were categorically ruled out by the Inningen municipal councillors at their meeting on Tuesday for the vacated Euroboden property in the Inning-Wörthsee industrial park.
Inning – Although the municipality of Wörthsee has a stake in the inter-municipal business park in the north of Inning, the Ammersee municipality alone has planning sovereignty. And Innings councillors took advantage of that right on Tuesday night. This is because the new owner of the former Euroboden property on Billerberg has concrete plans and demands that the development plan be amended. He would like to see currently unpermitted uses such as logistics businesses and restaurants permitted as the main use in the future and the development plan to be amended accordingly. But nothing comes of it.
Monika Schuessler-Kafka (FW) said it bluntly: "I don't want McDonald's there." Among other things, the local councillors fear that this is exactly what the property developer wants to locate on the 1.6-hectare site, right next to a logistics company. According to the applicant, there is a great need for both at this point. The local councillor, on the other hand, thought that hardly anything else was promising at this point. In any case, it is certain that the properties are traded above market value. And companies would have to be able to afford that in times like these.
Already represented with an office on Billerberg, the project developers know that there are no catering facilities in the business park. If you work there, you can only get your lunch at the gas station. Due to the expansion of the industrial park, hundreds of new employees would be happy to receive a corresponding offer at lunchtime. As reported, the municipality had sold five more plots of land in June. Construction is expected to begin early next year.
Dilemma: What exactly is gastronomy?
No one in the Council wanted to disagree on this point. But what form the gastronomic offer wants to be, they wanted to steer. "A canteen operation would be great," said Johann Ritzer (FBB). But how can a fast-food chain be prevented if a canteen is approved that certainly also offers takeaway food? The administration had already had a formulation legally approved: pubs and restaurants from the so-called full-service catering sector were to be declared permissible and from the so-called quick-service gastronomy not permissible. In the end, only one inn would be possible. But which landlord wants to open an inn in the traditional sense in the industrial park? And a snack, as the local councillors could well imagine, is also "quick". A dilemma.
Anna Herrmann (CSU) suggested proceeding by means of land limits. How exactly and whether this is possible, however, must first be examined in detail from a legal point of view, replied Michaela Meinhold, head of the building authority. "We shouldn't get too caught up in it," Ritzer said. The only question is, how do we exclude "the others" without him directly mentioning them by name? The Inningen municipal councillors did not find an answer to this on Tuesday. To be on the safe side, the new property owner's application for new uses was therefore rejected for the time being without any further determinations.