Anna Pines, Guy Pines and Tzipi Pines/Rafi Deloya
A conception is not only a military worldview.
It can be legal, scientific or communicative.
And yet there is a common denominator for all conceptions whatever they are - group thinking based on a deep (and authentic) inner conviction, and defending it at all costs - even in retrospect.
Psychologists call it rationalization, in the press it can be summarized as follows: straw arguments.
Here is a fresh and vivid example of this:
a tweet by "Haaretz" architecture reporter Naama Riva evoked quite a bit of emotion over the weekend, and mostly showered her with a net storm of the embarrassments seen here.
"The daughter of Guy Pines and the granddaughter of Tzipi Pines rolled straight from the army to a position in television? There is no GLAZ, decades of a cheap and privileged KA duplicated production line that flows like water to the media," Riva tweeted, what seems to the reasonable person to be quite true trivial.
A reminder of the facts:
less than a week after she was released from the IDF, Pines' daughter joined the Israel Broadcasting Corporation where she covers the Tel Aviv area and the center for news on television.
However, the reactions to the tweet - mainly, from Pines' colleagues from Glatz - proved more than anything the basic claim against The station, being the main production line for the press in Israel and therefore producing group thinking, the way in which most of the commenters insisted on not detaching for a moment from the personal issue and addressing the claim itself - was alone a golden vision.
"You are doing her a great injustice and a terrible thing"
"I interviewed Anna at her admissions committee," wrote one of them.
"Then I was one of the instructors in the course she took in Glatz.
Later I worked with her. I tell you with full responsibility - the best Anna in the world. Super talented and professional. Her acceptance to the station has nothing to do with her glorious family lineage (and out of respect for others I will not mention names of people with no less glorious lineage who were not accepted)."
"I ran into her when she was working, I was very impressed by her and you are doing her a great injustice and a terrible thing. You cast a taint on a young and worthy woman you don't know because you assumed by judgment that she is not talented just because of her family background, but that she might, not on us, be very good from what she saw All her life. Do you have a criticism of Glatz? Please, but leave it to Anna Pines," wrote another, and dozens more like her in a similar way.
He grew up doing Pines himself, Shatz to protect the natural talent of his house, and in a strange analogy he sent Riva to check whether the owner of the newspaper where she is employed (Shokan) is not privileged himself.
Riva was not helped by all the explanations about the fact that GLAZ is a big player in the company's paving, which supports groups attributed to them at an early age, and opens an almost certain future window of influence. Neither did the pleas about the station being an assembly line for presenters under the auspices of the systems that devour the cheap manpower. Riva's sentence, Under the auspices of the permanent milieu, it was ruled guilty.
More in Walla!
In the latest news, they refused to publish a campaign for Rolnik's new series
To the full article
Access to resources.
Illustration of Pines in Haaretz/screenshot, Haaretz
The house is the greatest generator of talent.
So much so that it is not certain that the young Pines (Pines as an example) had a choice.
But with this greenhouse, comes the price tag.
Even if it is inconvenient, it is worth recognizing it
Here is the place to note:
Pines' abilities are not relevant to the discussion at all.
The amazing thing is that none of the journalists who responded understood this.
That's why we'll take the personal hump out of the episode right now: as much as Glatz is an indication of some kind of journalistic quality, and as much as this can even exist at the age of 21, Pines is probably a good and talented reporter.
She successfully completed the correspondence course, and despite her young age, she demonstrated a high work ethic and ambitions.
In fact, the chances are that Pines Jr. - who naturally absorbed the sentiment and the "media vibe" already in her infancy - is more than worthy of her role.
Just like the son of a policeman learned to love the uniform and became a policeman, the son of a conductor - who as a child saw his father besieged in his room determined in front of musical scales and learned to play the trumpet, and the daughter of a doctor who watched her mother save lives - and decided to become a doctor.
This is also a fact:
the house is the greatest generator of talent.
So much so that it is not certain that the young Pines (Pines as an example) had a choice.
But with this greenhouse, comes the price tag.
Even if it is inconvenient, it is worth recognizing it.
The multitude of cross-reactions ignores a parallel set of facts:
Pines, like many good ones who were born into senior positions in the media and entered the largest and most influential press mill in Israel - Gali IDF - is not only the sum of her abilities, but also the sum of the privileges she was born with. This is of course not a sin, but certainly Not a reason for pity.
People with a social consciousness (one that may not be taught in the corridors of a Glatz school or developed at the age of 21) understand that even if the parent does not "get them a job" or give them a monthly allowance - financial support, future inheritance, connections, a jumping off point, Guarantees, deep pockets that can allow risk-taking and even behavioral tools for making money - all these things are worth a lot of money and privileges.
Leek with guarantees.
Lokach/screenshot, Keshet 12
Is the fact that during her military service, Pines began to illustrate in the gallery supplement of "Haaretz" an option that was also open to parents who had no access to Haaretz's editors?
Maybe, maybe not
Is the fact that during her military service, Pines began to illustrate in the gallery supplement of "Haaretz" an option that was also open to parents who had no access to Haaretz's editors?
Maybe, maybe not.
Would she have been accepted to Glatz in any case?
Maybe, or maybe she wouldn't have applied at all because she wouldn't have known about the option.
But the truth is that it doesn't matter at all, because the truth needs to be told: access is a resource and a resource is a privilege.
These are gifts that a person born into a family that is not rich or not connected will probably never receive.
In a framed article it will be said that Yasmin Lukach - the stepdaughter of Sheldon Adelson (the late) who provides tips on how to become rich in the "Sharks" show - is also a good business woman. This does not mean that one should ignore the tip she received herself in the form of a father who is one of the richest people in the world. This is of course Not saying that it is not worthy, just that it is worth putting metaphorical due diligence every time one admires the talent, to the fact that not everyone had the right to enjoy this starting point, and even if one needs golden advice along the way.
More in Walla!
Presenter alongside Yair Netanyahu and the author of the book on "Consciousness Engineering": Karai's recommendations for the Second Authority
To the full article
Milcera
Wertheimer/Or Gefen
You are not the victim
If the problem started and ended in relation to resources and communication, then even Twitter would be big on this discussion.
But the problem and disconnection is much deeper than the question of Geltz or news here 11. One of the main characteristics of the idea of Bibism, is playing on the feelings of deprivation, not always justified, of people who feel that they are destined to live their lives outside the circle of influence and decision-making.
Of course, under Netanyahu's destructive influence, this feeling became a main motive.
But one has to wonder: does this entrance ticket that Pines won (and many others beside her) contribute to this feeling or not.
A few years ago, the actress Mia Wertheimer was interviewed in the "Et" newspaper, and revealed that despite being a scion of one of the richest families in Israel, she worked as a waitress and financed her driving lessons herself (!).
This is of course highly valued, and indicates a work ethic and independence, but is it enough to purchase an apartment in the Garden Garden tower in north Tel Aviv?
Does it change the fact that she was born into a basket of privileges that only a few get?
Should she sit at her mother's door and be ashamed?
Definately not.
Is she worthy of appreciation?
Maybe.
But in Israel a new demand has arisen, which expects not only to ignore the class differences, but also to feel pity or compassion towards those whose luck has favored them, because they have to "prove that they are worthy despite the high starting point they had".
It's worth remembering and reminding from time to time, even to Glatz graduates: you are not the victim.
More on the same topic:
Guy Pines
Galei Tzahal
Here is 11