Geneva-Sana
The delegation of the so-called "opposition" rejected "no paper" on counter-terrorism presented by the Syrian-backed delegation today during the sessions of the mini-committee to discuss the constitution.
The correspondent stated that the national delegation submitted a "no paper" on the fight against terrorism in order to try to reach a common ground among the members of the Committee and to make real progress in its work, but the delegation of the other party refused to discuss it entirely, citing that it is a statement, although the national delegation put it in paper form for discussion. This confirms that the delegation of the other party still insists on not discussing any item related to combating terrorism and condemning its supporters.
The "la paper" condemned all terrorist acts committed and committed by all terrorist organizations in Syria, in particular ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, and stresses the need to re-establish state control over the entire territory of the Syrian Arab Republic and to restore state institutions to all regions. Services for citizens.
The "No Paper" calls for the united efforts of all the Syrian people to work to complete the fight against "Daesh" and "victory" and other terrorist organizations in Syria, in addition to stressing the importance of rejecting and eradicating extremist ideology and the need to devote the letter and spirit of combating terrorism in the constitutional reform project. The drafting of constitutional articles to ensure this, while stressing that the fight against terrorism guarantees one of the most basic rights of Syrians, the right to life and to enjoy security and security.
The “No Paper” also included an invitation to the members of the Committee to call on all States and parties to commit themselves not to support terrorism and to emphasize the need to implement the relevant Security Council resolutions related to combating terrorism, in particular resolutions 1373/2170/2178/2199/2253 /.
Upon leaving the government-supported delegation, SANA's representative asked him about the paper and confirmed that he had submitted it and that the other party's delegation refused to discuss it.
