After it was decided that MK Yashbak could run for the Knesset, exploiting political freedom and freedom of expression to destroy democracy - is a challenge facing the court
MK Hiba Izbak // Photo: Oren Ben Hakun
Last week, a court hearing was held in Lod, centered on Mohammed Bakri and his film "Jenin Jenin". The false propaganda film ran on the card of "Protecting Freedom of Expression and Art Freedom." Yesterday, the Supreme Court in Israel announced the decision on Hiba's right to be run on the joint list as part of the Knesset ballot. This is the right to choose and to be elected. Holy right.
Many revolt and criticize the Supreme Court. In this case, it is doubtful that there is room for such criticism from the stomach. Testify to this split boundary decision, with only one voice of the nine judges passing through will obstruct the hurdle on the way to the monarchy. If so, Yezbak will also be welcomed by President Robbie Rivlin's hospitality.
High Court discusses disqualification of MK Yizbak // Photo: Ami Shamir
Yezbek will also be crowded in line to recommend the second prime minister, Benny Gantz. And Ofer must have already run to his fellow Democratic citizens from the villages in the Triangle, to make sure that Hiba Yazbak will be separated. The LGBT Patriots program does not include the possibility of admitting two of the worst terrorists in the history of the war against Israel to join Netanyahu's mission.
The positions of President Esther on the one hand and Anat Baron on the other hand reflect the controversy. "The two most serious evidence in Izbek's case. Concerning Kuntar and Mograbi, they are sufficient to formulate a critical mass of compelling, clear and unequivocal evidence of a disqualification cause," the President wrote. Justice Baron, however, expresses "doubt about Yizbak's support for an armed struggle against the State of Israel."
It is quite clear, however, that Yizbak's entire approach, whether declaring support for terrorism or denying the existence of the Jewish state on a theoretical basis, indicates its part in the fight against the state. The court, whether in Lod or in Jerusalem, has become an arena in the ongoing political and ideological struggle against the State of Israel. That's the main story.
Carrying animals, according to statements in various forums, is very aware of the vulnerability of democracy. According to its ruling, it is clear that those who support terrorists cannot flaunt the feathers of democracy. Utilizing the basic principles of democracy of political freedom and freedom of expression to destroy democracy is a challenge that is at the door of the court. According to the decision yesterday, if and when Netanyahu's appointment as the coalition component rolls into the court's door, it will be a problem to say that it is and is not.
