It so happened that Esti Ginzburg lost in an investigation by Haim Etgar and Keshet 12 against her and her husband even before it aired:
On Tuesday this week, a promo was aired for the first time for a new investigation by the presenter, centered on the model and her husband, businessman Adi Keisman.
The promising promo featured casualties from collaborations with the couple, as well as its paparazzi from abroad that gave the impression that this was an in-depth, dramatic and interesting investigation.
It should be noted: these words were written even before watching the research.
Still, Ginzburg started her new war on the left foot.
The day after the promo aired, Ginzburg opened fire when she posted a post on the subject, in which she described two types of people, she said.
"The professional - one who conducts in-depth research and brings facts to the public as they are without distortion, without rounding corners and without harming innocent people," she wrote, In order to promote one's own ratings and the interests of others. '
Haim Etgar, Photo: Meir Partosh
As mentioned, I did not watch the investigation, but the amateur in this case actually belongs to Ginzburg, which is a shame.
With 18 years of experience in the industry, she should have known that going against an investigation even before it aired is the dream of every researcher and presenter.
A move of this kind only increases the curiosity of viewers at home and followers on Instagram, where she posted her response.
In fact, there is no small chance that Ginzburg even made hundreds of thousands of her followers watch the investigation, which otherwise she might not have known existed.
Worse, it is possible that he also helped to prepare it - since in a reaction like hers caused people, who were allegedly harmed by her husband and her, to contact the authors of the investigation.
In conclusion, it would have been better for her to respond at least after the debriefing was broadcast, or later, on a competing platform.
Erans@israelhayom.co.il
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us