The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The Hong Kong version of the National Security Law ︳Britain and Macao issued a statement of concern to the Chinese Embassy's approval of gross interference in internal affairs

2020-05-23T05:50:18.620Z


The National People's Congress and the CPPCC National Committee convened yesterday (22nd). The agenda included a review of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law." Listed in Annex III of the "Hong Kong Basic Law" and promulgated by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Yesterday, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia issued a joint statement expressing their deep concern about China ’s plan to implement the National Security Law in Hong Kong. The Chinese Embassy in Canada issued a statement today criticizing the foreign minister ’s gross interference in Hong Kong affairs and China ’s internal affairs. China ’s national security poses a real threat, and no foreign country has the right to intervene, expressing strong dissatisfaction with such actions.


Political situation

Written by: Chen Chuolan

2020-05-23 13:40

Last update date: 2020-05-23 13:40

The National People's Congress and the CPPCC National Committee convened yesterday (22nd). The agenda included a review of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law." Listed in Annex III of the "Hong Kong Basic Law" and promulgated by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Yesterday, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia issued a joint statement expressing their deep concern about China ’s plan to implement the National Security Law in Hong Kong. The Chinese Embassy in Canada issued a statement today criticizing the foreign minister ’s gross interference in Hong Kong affairs and China ’s internal affairs. China ’s national security poses a real threat, and no foreign country has the right to intervene, expressing strong dissatisfaction with such actions.

British Foreign Secretary Lan Taowen. (AP)

The Chinese Embassy in Canada made a statement on the website today, criticizing the joint statement of the three countries for grossly interfering in Hong Kong affairs and China's internal affairs. China expressed strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to this, and emphasized that any country in the world is responsible for national security legislation. The power to establish the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" at the national level to safeguard national sovereignty is "reasonable and lawful, it is imperative", and points out that Hong Kong is a special administrative region of China, and the central government ’s legislation for Hong Kong is purely China ’s internal affairs, and foreign countries have no Power intervention.

The content of the talk referred to the anti-revision laws in Hong Kong last year, referring to the act of separatist forces by local radicals, seriously challenging the bottom line of "one country, two systems" and threatening national security, and emphasizing that maintaining national security is the core of "one country, two systems". There is no "two systems". The current legislation is for the people of Hong Kong to exercise their legal rights and make decisions that are in the interests of society and the common interests of the international community, including Canada.

[Hong Kong version of the National Security Law] The British, Australian and Canadian foreign ministers issued a statement to pay attention to the EU's call for China to respect a high degree of autonomy

Hong Kong version of the National Security Law | Han Zhengjian Minato CPPCC: Last year, it was determined to establish the Hong Kong National Security System

Hong Kong version of National Security Law | Luo Zhiguang: Citizens can express their concern only if they are not responsible for basic law

[Hong Kong version of the National Security Law] White House officials: funds or withdrawal of Hong Kong will lose the status of financial center

Hong Kong version of the National Security Law

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-05-23

Similar news:

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.