The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

What we did not do from '67. | Israel today

2022-06-02T20:32:52.955Z


Labor voted in favor when the law normalized the occupation, and when clauses were introduced that normalized the Oslo Accords - the right-wing parties supported • Both the Likud and the left have an interest in keeping the settlers in the air • There is historical justice here with the state consistently seeing type B.


"Judea and Samaria Law" is an illusion through which Gideon Saar tries to pave the way back to the national camp. Judea and Samaria is the ladder that Saar is trying to climb when the smell of elections rises in his nose, and so far he has passed a term without achievements to the right.

He tries to paint the law as "mini-sovereignty", although in practice it is the opposite: the law is a spin dedicated to the right.

The Deputy Speaker chose to mark the week that celebrates the 55th anniversary of the historic event in which Mota Gur read "The Temple Mount is in our hands" and Moshe Dayan returned the keys to Waqf, in a special proclamation entitled: ", In which she detailed what might happen if the temporary order, which has been extended for 55 years, is not extended.

Every five years the government almost automatically points, in fact, to the lack of a decision on the issue of the occupied territories.

Or the liberated.

Yos, Yesha, or if Shimrit Meir writes to you - the West Bank. 

According to Deputy Sompolinsky's frightening report, the current situation must be continued and another band-aid must be put in place. It cites a series of threats to public order, particularly the judiciary, such as: The prisoners are brought up for discussion, and the author is concerned that there are no buildings in Judea and Samaria to which they can be transferred.

Not from the graceful conditions of incarceration, not from release in angular deals, not from nose surgeries to terrorists;

The urgent letter also states that it will be difficult to prosecute Israelis who have committed criminal offenses in Israeli courts.

Why?

Because the ID card says they are settlers.

Right-wing governments have been changing here since 1977, and no one has seen importance in regulating settler status as legitimate human beings.

Sompolinsky further warns that if the temporary order is not extended, there will be no other rights for Israelis in Judea and Samaria, such as state health insurance or surrogacy;

Here there is a certain historical justice with one whom the state consistently considers type B.

fun.

Inspired by makeup artists Kishon

When the deputy ombudsman threatens that it will be difficult to conduct Israeli civil tort claims against Palestinians, such as in a car accident, the question arises as to whether she is inspired by Ephraim Kishon. Roads with Palestinians.

Although the Oslo Accords set up an enforcement mechanism through the Palestinian Authority, in practice it does not function and Israeli drivers required to do so claim their own insurance, pay deductibles and exorbitant insurance premiums thereafter, simply because there is no one to talk to.

The PA serves as a city of refuge for criminals, and Israeli police would rather fine Israelis for speeding at the Carmei Tzur junction than enforce stone-throwing a kilometer away, in al-Arub. 

Saar's spin is a sham, but it's a small sham compared to the big lie that right - wing governments, for the most part, have been holding on to for years.

Israel consciously chooses not to connect to it what is left of the territories liberated in the Six Day War.

The suffocating Palmach generals who commanded the liberation of Hebron and Nablus would not believe that in Israel in 2022 a Jew will not be allowed to purchase land in Judea and Samaria, when even in Europe no such restrictions apply to him.

Labor parties voted in favor, with the law normalizing the occupation.

In the last 25 years, clauses have been introduced that also normalize the Oslo Accords, and the right-wing parties have supported them.

No spotlight was turned on the issue, because both the Likud and the party have an interest in keeping the settlers in the air.

That it will always be possible to evacuate one or two parts of the country and threaten the State of Judah with a population that pays taxes, serves in the army and receives refugees a thousand times more than any other company.

Settlers are not equal citizens of the State of Israel, they are puppets in the chessboard of Israeli politics, on almost all wings.

On foot from the field of Moab

Who is right?

In the State of Israel, one tends to think, the right is the one who supports settlement in Judea and Samaria.

Right?

Leftists do not want settlements, rightists do.

A nation of intellectuals, and this silly theme still, for some reason, catches on.

Localities established by the party and the Likud corner will not move us from the paradigm.

So maybe on the weekend we will think. On Shavuot we read about Naomi, who did not give up on the ridicule and the age that they showed towards her, and decided to rebuild her life. We immersed ourselves in the romantic affair of Ruth and Boaz, The scrolls would pop up to visit they might have been happy to discover Gush Etzion on the edge of the trails where the mythology took place, but they might have preferred to walk to the field of Moab.

The practice of life in Judea and Samaria has become unbearable during the current government, which stopped development work on the roads, made daily traffic impossible and continued the construction freeze. And understand what life in Hebron, Etzion and Samaria should look like.

It is impossible to continue to miss both sections every five years in June, Gideon.

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2022-06-02

Similar news:

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.