The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Canal + condemned to the prud'hommes for the dismissal of Stéphane Guy

2022-09-13T16:51:03.570Z


The leading voice of French football, Stéphane Guy had learned of his dismissal on Christmas Eve 2020.


The prud'hommes condemned Canal + for the "

dismissal without real and serious cause

" of its former star commentator Stéphane Guy who will however appeal to obtain the cancellation of his dismissal, announced his lawyer to AFP, confirming information of the team.

To discover

  • OUR FILE - Elizabeth II, a rock and a symbol for England

According to a copy of the judgment of the Paris industrial tribunal, delivered on August 29 and consulted by AFP on Tuesday, the encrypted channel was ordered to pay him just over 260,000 euros in damages which will not be paid. before the decision on appeal.

Read alsoThe war between TF1 and Canal+ benefits France 2

Flagship voice of French football, Stéphane Guy had learned of his dismissal on Christmas Eve 2020, after 23 years at Canal +, for having supported comedian Sébastien Thoen, himself fired for a parody targeting CNews, the channel group information.

Partially Satisfied

Stéphane Guy had paid tribute on the air to his "

friend

" who, according to him, had not had "

the outing he deserved

".

“ Faulty

” remarks

because aimed at “

publicly denigrating

” his employer, according to Canal +, quoted in the judgment.

The board decided: for him, "

the reasons invoked for the dismissal do not appear to be sufficiently serious

", but "

the attack on freedom of expression

" invoked by Stéphane Guy, supposed to lead to the nullity of his dismissal, is not demonstrated.

The journalist, who is calling for his reinstatement at Canal+, is "

not disappointed but partially satisfied

", his lawyer, Olivier Khatchikian, told AFP, considering that "

the board has not fully drawn the conclusions from what he himself raised it

”.

Once the board recognized that the remarks (by Stéphane Guy) were not defamatory and of such a nature as to justify his dismissal, the logical consequence was that there is a violation of the freedom of expression, which entails the nullity of the dismissal

”, estimated the lawyer.

Asked by AFP, Canal + did not wish to comment.

Source: lefigaro

All life articles on 2022-09-13

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.